▲ 1324 ▼ Under capitalism (i.imgur.com) submitted 3 years ago by BarterClub@sh.itjust.works to c/antiwork@lemmy.world 167 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) Labor has not conquered scarcity. Dear lord. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] willeypete23@reddthat.com 19 points 3 years ago (2 children) It actually has. The U.S. produces enough food to feed the entire world three times over. It's a matter of distribution and no one is going to invest in that because it's not profitable. . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago* (1 child) We grow enough corn to feed the whole world and then some, but we use it to feed cows and chicken in inhumane enviroments for "better food". Not a vegetarian or anything, just pointing out the awful nature of the meat industry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago I generally agree, but the industrial corn grown in the us actually isnt really all that edible. Like yes, you can eat it, but it tastes like sawdust. It was grown specifically to be processed. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sweet-corn-vs-field-corn_n_596f6718e4b0a03aba868f75 permalink fedilink source parent [+] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world -13 points 3 years ago (3 children) Just because there's a lot of it doesn't mean it isn't scarce permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WraithPriest@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) Please expand permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) This is essentially the "anything finite is scarce" argument. Since there isn't an actually unlimited amount of food available it's still scarce even if there's more of it than humans can use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago But that doesn't make sense in this context. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago That's exactly what that means, "more than enough" is the opposite of scarce. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Opafi@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago Say, why don't you take your hair-splitting somewhere else? Preferably a place that allows you to comfortly fuck yourself as well? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] willeypete23@reddthat.com 19 points 3 years ago (2 children) It actually has. The U.S. produces enough food to feed the entire world three times over. It's a matter of distribution and no one is going to invest in that because it's not profitable. . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago* (1 child) We grow enough corn to feed the whole world and then some, but we use it to feed cows and chicken in inhumane enviroments for "better food". Not a vegetarian or anything, just pointing out the awful nature of the meat industry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago I generally agree, but the industrial corn grown in the us actually isnt really all that edible. Like yes, you can eat it, but it tastes like sawdust. It was grown specifically to be processed. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sweet-corn-vs-field-corn_n_596f6718e4b0a03aba868f75 permalink fedilink source parent [+] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world -13 points 3 years ago (3 children) Just because there's a lot of it doesn't mean it isn't scarce permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WraithPriest@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) Please expand permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) This is essentially the "anything finite is scarce" argument. Since there isn't an actually unlimited amount of food available it's still scarce even if there's more of it than humans can use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago But that doesn't make sense in this context. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago That's exactly what that means, "more than enough" is the opposite of scarce. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Opafi@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago Say, why don't you take your hair-splitting somewhere else? Preferably a place that allows you to comfortly fuck yourself as well? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago* (1 child) We grow enough corn to feed the whole world and then some, but we use it to feed cows and chicken in inhumane enviroments for "better food". Not a vegetarian or anything, just pointing out the awful nature of the meat industry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago I generally agree, but the industrial corn grown in the us actually isnt really all that edible. Like yes, you can eat it, but it tastes like sawdust. It was grown specifically to be processed. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sweet-corn-vs-field-corn_n_596f6718e4b0a03aba868f75 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago I generally agree, but the industrial corn grown in the us actually isnt really all that edible. Like yes, you can eat it, but it tastes like sawdust. It was grown specifically to be processed. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sweet-corn-vs-field-corn_n_596f6718e4b0a03aba868f75 permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world -13 points 3 years ago (3 children) Just because there's a lot of it doesn't mean it isn't scarce permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WraithPriest@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) Please expand permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) This is essentially the "anything finite is scarce" argument. Since there isn't an actually unlimited amount of food available it's still scarce even if there's more of it than humans can use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago But that doesn't make sense in this context. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago That's exactly what that means, "more than enough" is the opposite of scarce. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Opafi@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago Say, why don't you take your hair-splitting somewhere else? Preferably a place that allows you to comfortly fuck yourself as well? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WraithPriest@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) Please expand permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) This is essentially the "anything finite is scarce" argument. Since there isn't an actually unlimited amount of food available it's still scarce even if there's more of it than humans can use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago But that doesn't make sense in this context. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) This is essentially the "anything finite is scarce" argument. Since there isn't an actually unlimited amount of food available it's still scarce even if there's more of it than humans can use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago But that doesn't make sense in this context. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago But that doesn't make sense in this context. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago That's exactly what that means, "more than enough" is the opposite of scarce. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Opafi@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago Say, why don't you take your hair-splitting somewhere else? Preferably a place that allows you to comfortly fuck yourself as well? permalink fedilink source parent