1087
Steam Deck OLED announced (www.steamdeck.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
221 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

New OLED screen. New APU. And lots of small hardware improvements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

If I recall the early benchmarks by The Phawx, the Deck got the best performance-per-watt around 11 W TDP. So yeah at 15 W and up, it flattens out. Pushing it harder just drains the battery for diminishing FPS returns.

I think he says the sweet spot for *800Us was closer to 18 W, but I don't remember that as clearly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    My hands-on experience with both is that the Deck sings in the 12-15 range and the stock 6800 wants to be 15-20. After that the extra heat and noise doesn't justify the gains unless you really want to play something that is just at the edge.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I only have a Deck but 9 watts has been the magic number for me. Good battery life and very little fan noise in most games. I even run RDR2 at that with Cryobyte's "prettiest" settings, and it stays darn close to 30 FPS. I may have bumped down far shadows and water a notch but honestly it still looks great.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    It's definitely a matter of taste, but you still get a lot of performance per watt on the Deck between 9 and 12, so I typically prefer to crank it up a notch and aim for 35-40fps instead.

    Which option is preferable probably depends on how sensitive you are to low fps vs fan noise, so there's no right answer.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent