you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

Fwiw the biggest issue with bodycams is that they're expensive as hell. Milwaukee wanted to get better equipped with them a few years back and nobody wanted to pay. People want to defund police but it throws so much off. Even when they want to defund, Republicans refuse to push legislation to get more Crisis workers who can help and fund mental health care.

Most voters barely want to fund schools, let alone the police and poor/addicted/troubled lol.

https://www.jsonline.com/story/communities/west/news/wauwatosa/2021/04/12/cost-body-cameras-setback-milwaukee-area-departments/6966971002/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The cost of a body cam doesn’t have anything to do with policies on whether or not they can be turned off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The cost isn't the cam itself, it's the servers and their software and IT administrators to maintain them, the personnel to audit the videos, and the personnel to respond to records requests by being able to locate archived files and redeact private information of the people the police interact with in the requested videos. Spinning up and maintaining multiple departments that just didn't exist before a body cam program was implemented is a significant resource draw.

    If the auditing personnel aren't hired in sufficient numbers, or the IT personnel to keep the video archives actually usable, then turning off of bodycams won't ever be caught.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    But what does that have to do with a bodycam being turned off during an incident? We see them clearly disable them or cover them on their own. I’m not saying they need to be turned on 24/7, that’s obviously not feasible.

  • source
  • parent