▲ 653 ▼ “But how do I access it?” (i.imgur.com) submitted 2 years ago by gkd@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml 42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] deezbutts@lemm.ee 26 points 2 years ago (1 child) Eli5 server less, even on paper... permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xD@infosec.pub 28 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Instead of spinning up a classical server like Apache or IIS for what you need, you just write a single function that you can bind to an endpoint and just host that - the rest is abstracted away from you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Serverless sounds like a terrible name for this lmao. Why not remote functions or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xD@infosec.pub 22 points 2 years ago (1 child) Marketing™️ I guess? :P But probably because YOU don't have to fuck around with servers, for you it's just an upload of a function. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think that's the main reason, it's a good name explaining what you can expect: an environment where you don't have to worry about servers and don't need an administrator permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Why not just call it shared hosting though? It's essentially the same concept as getting a GoDaddy (or Bluegost or whatever) hosting account and uploading a PHP file lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago Shared hosting sounds like you don't have your data stored privately and doesn't sound like less work for the company. Don't look at the name from a technicians perspective, but from the perspective of a manager of a small startup who wants to reduce the overhead for hosting it's service as much as possible. Also serverless is not wrong per sé, it's exactly what you as the customer get. You could spin it the same way for every other instance. Why do you call GoDaddy "shared hosting", in the end it's just a pod on a kubernetes cluster. So why don't you call it "private kubernetes pod"? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 28 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Instead of spinning up a classical server like Apache or IIS for what you need, you just write a single function that you can bind to an endpoint and just host that - the rest is abstracted away from you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Serverless sounds like a terrible name for this lmao. Why not remote functions or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xD@infosec.pub 22 points 2 years ago (1 child) Marketing™️ I guess? :P But probably because YOU don't have to fuck around with servers, for you it's just an upload of a function. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think that's the main reason, it's a good name explaining what you can expect: an environment where you don't have to worry about servers and don't need an administrator permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Why not just call it shared hosting though? It's essentially the same concept as getting a GoDaddy (or Bluegost or whatever) hosting account and uploading a PHP file lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago Shared hosting sounds like you don't have your data stored privately and doesn't sound like less work for the company. Don't look at the name from a technicians perspective, but from the perspective of a manager of a small startup who wants to reduce the overhead for hosting it's service as much as possible. Also serverless is not wrong per sé, it's exactly what you as the customer get. You could spin it the same way for every other instance. Why do you call GoDaddy "shared hosting", in the end it's just a pod on a kubernetes cluster. So why don't you call it "private kubernetes pod"? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Serverless sounds like a terrible name for this lmao. Why not remote functions or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xD@infosec.pub 22 points 2 years ago (1 child) Marketing™️ I guess? :P But probably because YOU don't have to fuck around with servers, for you it's just an upload of a function. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think that's the main reason, it's a good name explaining what you can expect: an environment where you don't have to worry about servers and don't need an administrator permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Why not just call it shared hosting though? It's essentially the same concept as getting a GoDaddy (or Bluegost or whatever) hosting account and uploading a PHP file lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago Shared hosting sounds like you don't have your data stored privately and doesn't sound like less work for the company. Don't look at the name from a technicians perspective, but from the perspective of a manager of a small startup who wants to reduce the overhead for hosting it's service as much as possible. Also serverless is not wrong per sé, it's exactly what you as the customer get. You could spin it the same way for every other instance. Why do you call GoDaddy "shared hosting", in the end it's just a pod on a kubernetes cluster. So why don't you call it "private kubernetes pod"? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 22 points 2 years ago (1 child) Marketing™️ I guess? :P But probably because YOU don't have to fuck around with servers, for you it's just an upload of a function. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think that's the main reason, it's a good name explaining what you can expect: an environment where you don't have to worry about servers and don't need an administrator permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Why not just call it shared hosting though? It's essentially the same concept as getting a GoDaddy (or Bluegost or whatever) hosting account and uploading a PHP file lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago Shared hosting sounds like you don't have your data stored privately and doesn't sound like less work for the company. Don't look at the name from a technicians perspective, but from the perspective of a manager of a small startup who wants to reduce the overhead for hosting it's service as much as possible. Also serverless is not wrong per sé, it's exactly what you as the customer get. You could spin it the same way for every other instance. Why do you call GoDaddy "shared hosting", in the end it's just a pod on a kubernetes cluster. So why don't you call it "private kubernetes pod"? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrM@feddit.de 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think that's the main reason, it's a good name explaining what you can expect: an environment where you don't have to worry about servers and don't need an administrator permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Why not just call it shared hosting though? It's essentially the same concept as getting a GoDaddy (or Bluegost or whatever) hosting account and uploading a PHP file lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago Shared hosting sounds like you don't have your data stored privately and doesn't sound like less work for the company. Don't look at the name from a technicians perspective, but from the perspective of a manager of a small startup who wants to reduce the overhead for hosting it's service as much as possible. Also serverless is not wrong per sé, it's exactly what you as the customer get. You could spin it the same way for every other instance. Why do you call GoDaddy "shared hosting", in the end it's just a pod on a kubernetes cluster. So why don't you call it "private kubernetes pod"? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dan@upvote.au 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Why not just call it shared hosting though? It's essentially the same concept as getting a GoDaddy (or Bluegost or whatever) hosting account and uploading a PHP file lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago Shared hosting sounds like you don't have your data stored privately and doesn't sound like less work for the company. Don't look at the name from a technicians perspective, but from the perspective of a manager of a small startup who wants to reduce the overhead for hosting it's service as much as possible. Also serverless is not wrong per sé, it's exactly what you as the customer get. You could spin it the same way for every other instance. Why do you call GoDaddy "shared hosting", in the end it's just a pod on a kubernetes cluster. So why don't you call it "private kubernetes pod"? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrM@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago Shared hosting sounds like you don't have your data stored privately and doesn't sound like less work for the company. Don't look at the name from a technicians perspective, but from the perspective of a manager of a small startup who wants to reduce the overhead for hosting it's service as much as possible. Also serverless is not wrong per sé, it's exactly what you as the customer get. You could spin it the same way for every other instance. Why do you call GoDaddy "shared hosting", in the end it's just a pod on a kubernetes cluster. So why don't you call it "private kubernetes pod"? permalink fedilink source parent
