you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)

Yeah, there's a big difference between pro cycling and biking to get around. The pro peloton isn't remotely sustainable—lots of international travel, transfers of team cars, team buses, helicopters, signal relay planes, etc. I suppose no pro sport is green. But biking for transport is one of the most efficient and sustainable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Yeah, there's a big difference between pro cycling and biking to get around.

    Of course, but there's also a big difference between a cycling race and a car race.

    Neither are vital transportation, but one is a helluva lot more polluting for entertainment than the other.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    I suppose no pro sport is green.

    SailGP claims to be trying, although I have... questions... about how they get both their boats and personnel from event location to event location, as well as the use of combustion-powered support boats during races. (Frankly, I won't really believe they're green until they've built a sailing cargo ship to schlep those racing catamarans around.)

  • source
  • parent