95
Cities: Skylines 2 devs warn players of performance problems: 'we have not achieved the benchmark we targeted' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M] to c/games@sh.itjust.works
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

So don’t release it.

Why? "Requires high-end hardware" is not the same as "unstable trash". If they publish realistic hardware requirements, I see no deceiving of the customer base. They made an announcement ahead of release. They could have just quietly updated the system requirements or even lie but they didn't.

If the games runs solid otherwise, so no major instabilities, I see no problem with that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    To me it reads like they're not happy with where the game is right now, that they'd prefer to tweak it more. I don't expect that it'll be as disastrous as say Cyberpunk, but I'm dead tired of developers releasing games they don't view as finished because the publishers went live with a release date prematurely.

    I work in software dev; if we don't finish the software on time, we don't go live with it. We might take a hit on our revenue, or we might need to ask our customer for more funding, but we don't go live with broken software.

    CO is Finnish, and I think they don't crunch their employees, but lots of gaming companies do, and they use ridiculous release targets as an excuse. Crunch doesn't even work. So in the end you burn the workers and you give a worse product to the customers.

    It's stupid.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago

    To me it reads like they’re not happy with where the game is right now, that they’d prefer to tweak it more.

    But they made the choice to go with Unity early. I'm not a developer myself but I've seen many statements of people who are who say that there is a certain ceiling with Unity that's not there in AAA game engines like UE.

    I work in software dev; if we don’t finish the software on time, we don’t go live with it. We might take a hit on our revenue, or we might need to ask our customer for more funding, but we don’t go live with broken software.

    But then you should know that there is a difference between benchmark scores and general bugginess.

    If the game is otherwise done and stable, why not just be open to the customer base and tell them about higher system requirements and ship the game? Cities Skylines 2 is no Kickstarter game. They can't ask their customers for more money beforehand. They get the money from selling a product.

    If the game turns out that it's an unstable mess, I'll fully agree with you. But for now it's only about raised system requirements that are being openly communicated ahead of release.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent