you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

But Meta forces you to have an account to view content, which is already privacy-invading enough.

And shame on the businesses and organizations who only use these platforms to update their customers/members.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We need a nitter for everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    I use lots of these but I don't think we have one for Instagram though, no?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's like every business in my city, I hate it. Want to check out a restaurants menu before trying it out? Look on Facebook. Need to call a business or check holiday hours? Contact info is on Facebook. Makes not having Facebook a huge barrier. Heck even my union basically only communicates over Facebook aside from the occasional email. 😑

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I can't join our local BIKE CLUB because they only post events, and group happenings on FB, and I refuse to get back on that platform.

    Any company or org that claims to be accessible needs to stop posting exclusively on locked-in social media platforms. That's the opposite of accessible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments