82
Signal requiring phone number, thoughts on anonymity? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

signal requires a phone number to sign up. a phone number could be used to trace your signal account back to you. so why do people, especially privacy enthusiasts and experts (like edward snowden), still use it and endorse it when it lacks anonymity in that sense? i get that people could use a voip number or something to sign up, but still.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 71 points 2 years ago (1 child)

You know I live in that house across the street, but my blinds are closed and I don't let you in. That's privacy, despite your knowledge.

There's a glass house across town. You drive by, but you don't know who lives there, who owns it, or why they insist on walking around naked. Anonymous, albeit open.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Also while it seems ideal to have both (don't know who lives there or what they're up to), it's much harder to implement in a way that there aren't ethical/legal headaches.

    It can also be easier from the usability side, like if you want to get in touch with your friend and you know where they are living today.

    I'd like to have the option to not use a number, and it would help those that live under authoritarian regimes, but I don't think I'll go through the trouble of removing mine once they implement it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •