BIG ZIPPER also those are called murr suits not fur suits.... they are generally a lot less nice and more functional. I don't own either but have thought of getting one of the really thin printed fabric types to go with my hood.

You would see it from 10 to 20ft away assuming you have decent vision

It's directly involving non consenting, unaware, people in their sexual fetish. It's definitely creepy and not okay.

Can you please stop trying to work backwards from your conclusion to the supporting evidence.

I got into the fandom from reading Ozzy and Millie https://ozyandmillie.org/

The pictures came before the suits were something most people could easily buy.

This is it. 25 years ago you couldnt easily buy a fursuit. All of my expierence with furries have been sexual dipictions and art online. its all sexual (that ive seen). Even the one furry couple i met at a party, they werent in dress, and him and his girl tried to "pick me up" and I declined, but someone told me after they were furries. I didnt care, but ive never seen it presented out of a sexual context. And this is a new thing, it's new to a lot of people for the fact you couldnt get these outfits so easily a decade ot two ago. So its new, it is odd, not to use this word odd in a negitive way, but objectivly its odd, and many dont understand.

so you grow up online seeing sexual furry art everywhere, and then now today see a furry ..at the zoo(come on).. the mental connection is visceral from the only other exposure outsiders have seen.

I honestly find it irresponsible this group that went to a zoo.

because of this connection of fur suits and sexual fetish, it very hard for some outsiders not to feel like its unconsentually exposing this fetish to the public.