▲ 523 ▼ You're basically losing money if you don't (startrek.website) submitted 2 years ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website [M] to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) Lottery and gambling are taxes on emotionally weak people who can't do math. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ladicius@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) Lotteries unique selling point is hope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ScrotusMaximus@lemmy.ninja 7 points 2 years ago Isn't it telling that our society has to gamble on hope because there is a perception of no other chance? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure, but the hope is a result of the first two issues. They can't do the math so they think there is a chance. And because they WANT there to be a chance they ignore every time they lose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ladicius@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I know you have a point, a good one, Lotteries cater to the vulnerable etc. - but you are wrong in one aspect: There are winners, in every lottery, and that's what fuels the hope. Even small chances are chances. It's that simple ;) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) When did I say there weren't any winners? I said people think there's a chance that they might win personally. And you can state the gamblers fallacy any way you like, the fact that there are winners in a lottery has nothing to with the chances of winning personally. Bad at math, bad at logic, too emotional, call it anything you like. Any hope is a result of these flaws, not the cause. https://www.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/Gambler%27s%20Fallacy.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably more likely to turn 20$ into a fortune playing the lottery than most other ways you could invest it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Honestly, chances might be extremely low. But if all it takes is a couple of bucks sometimes to maybe win even 1000, I'd take it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 point 2 years ago Ah, my bread and butter… Thrill-seeking rich folk with a poor grasp of statistics and probability. Manny Calavera, travel agent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago They know, that's their target audience. Desperate people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) Lotteries unique selling point is hope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ScrotusMaximus@lemmy.ninja 7 points 2 years ago Isn't it telling that our society has to gamble on hope because there is a perception of no other chance? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure, but the hope is a result of the first two issues. They can't do the math so they think there is a chance. And because they WANT there to be a chance they ignore every time they lose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ladicius@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I know you have a point, a good one, Lotteries cater to the vulnerable etc. - but you are wrong in one aspect: There are winners, in every lottery, and that's what fuels the hope. Even small chances are chances. It's that simple ;) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) When did I say there weren't any winners? I said people think there's a chance that they might win personally. And you can state the gamblers fallacy any way you like, the fact that there are winners in a lottery has nothing to with the chances of winning personally. Bad at math, bad at logic, too emotional, call it anything you like. Any hope is a result of these flaws, not the cause. https://www.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/Gambler%27s%20Fallacy.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably more likely to turn 20$ into a fortune playing the lottery than most other ways you could invest it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Honestly, chances might be extremely low. But if all it takes is a couple of bucks sometimes to maybe win even 1000, I'd take it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ScrotusMaximus@lemmy.ninja 7 points 2 years ago Isn't it telling that our society has to gamble on hope because there is a perception of no other chance? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure, but the hope is a result of the first two issues. They can't do the math so they think there is a chance. And because they WANT there to be a chance they ignore every time they lose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ladicius@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I know you have a point, a good one, Lotteries cater to the vulnerable etc. - but you are wrong in one aspect: There are winners, in every lottery, and that's what fuels the hope. Even small chances are chances. It's that simple ;) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) When did I say there weren't any winners? I said people think there's a chance that they might win personally. And you can state the gamblers fallacy any way you like, the fact that there are winners in a lottery has nothing to with the chances of winning personally. Bad at math, bad at logic, too emotional, call it anything you like. Any hope is a result of these flaws, not the cause. https://www.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/Gambler%27s%20Fallacy.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably more likely to turn 20$ into a fortune playing the lottery than most other ways you could invest it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Honestly, chances might be extremely low. But if all it takes is a couple of bucks sometimes to maybe win even 1000, I'd take it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I know you have a point, a good one, Lotteries cater to the vulnerable etc. - but you are wrong in one aspect: There are winners, in every lottery, and that's what fuels the hope. Even small chances are chances. It's that simple ;) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) When did I say there weren't any winners? I said people think there's a chance that they might win personally. And you can state the gamblers fallacy any way you like, the fact that there are winners in a lottery has nothing to with the chances of winning personally. Bad at math, bad at logic, too emotional, call it anything you like. Any hope is a result of these flaws, not the cause. https://www.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/Gambler%27s%20Fallacy.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably more likely to turn 20$ into a fortune playing the lottery than most other ways you could invest it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Honestly, chances might be extremely low. But if all it takes is a couple of bucks sometimes to maybe win even 1000, I'd take it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) When did I say there weren't any winners? I said people think there's a chance that they might win personally. And you can state the gamblers fallacy any way you like, the fact that there are winners in a lottery has nothing to with the chances of winning personally. Bad at math, bad at logic, too emotional, call it anything you like. Any hope is a result of these flaws, not the cause. https://www.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/Gambler%27s%20Fallacy.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably more likely to turn 20$ into a fortune playing the lottery than most other ways you could invest it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Honestly, chances might be extremely low. But if all it takes is a couple of bucks sometimes to maybe win even 1000, I'd take it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably more likely to turn 20$ into a fortune playing the lottery than most other ways you could invest it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Honestly, chances might be extremely low. But if all it takes is a couple of bucks sometimes to maybe win even 1000, I'd take it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Honestly, chances might be extremely low. But if all it takes is a couple of bucks sometimes to maybe win even 1000, I'd take it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 point 2 years ago Ah, my bread and butter… Thrill-seeking rich folk with a poor grasp of statistics and probability. Manny Calavera, travel agent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago They know, that's their target audience. Desperate people. permalink fedilink source parent