▲ 292 ▼ US hires over 2,000 video gamers as air traffic controllers (www.fox21online.com) submitted 2 days ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 95 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 135 points 2 days ago (4 children) "We cannot allow you to protect your data." permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 43 points 2 days ago “We cannot take a print of your anus, therefore we are blocking you” permalink fedilink source parent [–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago (3 children) There should be an extension that prevents you from risking your privacy accessing an american site that does this Then again americans wouldn't be able to access 90% of their internet so maybe it would be pointless permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Mediocre_Bard_Redeux@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago As an American, I would use it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 7 points 2 days ago Well in this case the website itself is preventing me from risking my privacy accessing it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago A VPN. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 7 points 2 days ago (2 children) Fox 21 is a local affiliate of Fox based in Duluth, MN. It’s a regional news source for Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota. I seriously doubt they get enough traffic from GDPR regulated countries to retrofit their entire site to be compliant when it is targeted for a very specific audience in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) they don't need to retrofit their entire website. GDPR does not require the website to do anything, it requires websites to not do certain greedy things. that's all. that's the nice thing, they could just remove all the tracking code and they are compliant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 1 point 19 hours ago they don't need to retrofit their entire website. Except they do, because even if they’re pretty certain their site is compliant with GDPR they’d still have to review the code to make certain it is or risk legal liability if anything isn’t. Many small to medium organizations that aren’t operating outside of the USA chose to just block connections instead. Is there a lot of people outside the US checking an “affiliate for the Duluth-Superior broadcast area, which covers northeastern Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin, and the western portion of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula” regularly for their news? permalink fedilink source parent [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Yes, but also, it is sad you can automatically safely assume a news site that we only want to display our news will be handling a fuck-ton of our personal information. If it just showed the news and non-targeted ads, it wouldn't need a retrofit. GDPR wouldn't apply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 0 points 19 hours ago GDPR is a law with real legal consequences that protects EU citizens (EU as in European Union). Do European citizens frequently turn to an “affiliate for the Duluth-Superior broadcast area, which covers northeastern Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin, and the western portion of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula” for their news? Do you spouse it’s easier for a local or regional organization to set policy to block warn GDPR covered connections or have someone spend time ensuring the site is GDPR compliant for the 1s? 10s? 100s? of hits they get? permalink fedilink source parent [–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago I saw 'fox' in the URL and wasn't surprised. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 43 points 2 days ago “We cannot take a print of your anus, therefore we are blocking you” permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago (3 children) There should be an extension that prevents you from risking your privacy accessing an american site that does this Then again americans wouldn't be able to access 90% of their internet so maybe it would be pointless permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Mediocre_Bard_Redeux@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago As an American, I would use it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 7 points 2 days ago Well in this case the website itself is preventing me from risking my privacy accessing it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago A VPN. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mediocre_Bard_Redeux@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago As an American, I would use it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 7 points 2 days ago Well in this case the website itself is preventing me from risking my privacy accessing it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 7 points 2 days ago (2 children) Fox 21 is a local affiliate of Fox based in Duluth, MN. It’s a regional news source for Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota. I seriously doubt they get enough traffic from GDPR regulated countries to retrofit their entire site to be compliant when it is targeted for a very specific audience in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) they don't need to retrofit their entire website. GDPR does not require the website to do anything, it requires websites to not do certain greedy things. that's all. that's the nice thing, they could just remove all the tracking code and they are compliant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 1 point 19 hours ago they don't need to retrofit their entire website. Except they do, because even if they’re pretty certain their site is compliant with GDPR they’d still have to review the code to make certain it is or risk legal liability if anything isn’t. Many small to medium organizations that aren’t operating outside of the USA chose to just block connections instead. Is there a lot of people outside the US checking an “affiliate for the Duluth-Superior broadcast area, which covers northeastern Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin, and the western portion of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula” regularly for their news? permalink fedilink source parent [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Yes, but also, it is sad you can automatically safely assume a news site that we only want to display our news will be handling a fuck-ton of our personal information. If it just showed the news and non-targeted ads, it wouldn't need a retrofit. GDPR wouldn't apply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 0 points 19 hours ago GDPR is a law with real legal consequences that protects EU citizens (EU as in European Union). Do European citizens frequently turn to an “affiliate for the Duluth-Superior broadcast area, which covers northeastern Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin, and the western portion of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula” for their news? Do you spouse it’s easier for a local or regional organization to set policy to block warn GDPR covered connections or have someone spend time ensuring the site is GDPR compliant for the 1s? 10s? 100s? of hits they get? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) they don't need to retrofit their entire website. GDPR does not require the website to do anything, it requires websites to not do certain greedy things. that's all. that's the nice thing, they could just remove all the tracking code and they are compliant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 1 point 19 hours ago they don't need to retrofit their entire website. Except they do, because even if they’re pretty certain their site is compliant with GDPR they’d still have to review the code to make certain it is or risk legal liability if anything isn’t. Many small to medium organizations that aren’t operating outside of the USA chose to just block connections instead. Is there a lot of people outside the US checking an “affiliate for the Duluth-Superior broadcast area, which covers northeastern Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin, and the western portion of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula” regularly for their news? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 1 point 19 hours ago they don't need to retrofit their entire website. Except they do, because even if they’re pretty certain their site is compliant with GDPR they’d still have to review the code to make certain it is or risk legal liability if anything isn’t. Many small to medium organizations that aren’t operating outside of the USA chose to just block connections instead. Is there a lot of people outside the US checking an “affiliate for the Duluth-Superior broadcast area, which covers northeastern Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin, and the western portion of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula” regularly for their news? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Yes, but also, it is sad you can automatically safely assume a news site that we only want to display our news will be handling a fuck-ton of our personal information. If it just showed the news and non-targeted ads, it wouldn't need a retrofit. GDPR wouldn't apply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 0 points 19 hours ago GDPR is a law with real legal consequences that protects EU citizens (EU as in European Union). Do European citizens frequently turn to an “affiliate for the Duluth-Superior broadcast area, which covers northeastern Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin, and the western portion of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula” for their news? Do you spouse it’s easier for a local or regional organization to set policy to block warn GDPR covered connections or have someone spend time ensuring the site is GDPR compliant for the 1s? 10s? 100s? of hits they get? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 0 points 19 hours ago GDPR is a law with real legal consequences that protects EU citizens (EU as in European Union). Do European citizens frequently turn to an “affiliate for the Duluth-Superior broadcast area, which covers northeastern Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin, and the western portion of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula” for their news? Do you spouse it’s easier for a local or regional organization to set policy to block warn GDPR covered connections or have someone spend time ensuring the site is GDPR compliant for the 1s? 10s? 100s? of hits they get? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago I saw 'fox' in the URL and wasn't surprised. permalink fedilink source parent