I wish that was more helpful in understanding their views, but unfortunately I've seen pro-israeli people who try to couch things by mentioning that the killing of Palestinians is bad, but (insert qualifier for why Israel has a right to defend itself, etc). To be clear I'm not saying that qrstuv is doing that as well there, just that it doesn't really clear things up as much as hoped.

I also want to mention I am not a fan of purity testing, I think it can result in witch hunts and potentially mob sentiment, but there is a point where it's useful for someone to make their views clear so as not to be misunderstood. qrstuv has been posting what I would personally consider pro-israeli propaganda nytimes articles for quite some time now, without ever adding any of their own additional context that would clearly show they are posting it to point out how ridiculous it is, to mock, etc.

Some Examples (most of which now appear to be deleted from sdf itself? but are still are visible on my instance):

• There’s Only One Path to Victory in Iran
• How Migrant Workers Have Been Affected by Iran’s Strikes
• Iranian TV and Social Media Project Defiant and Distorted View of the War
• Trump and Netanyahu Are Doing the Free World a Favor
• The Case for Striking Iran
• Why Have You Started This War, Mr. President?
• The War Is Going Better Than You Think

I'm a big fan of Funhole, and I get that this is a very jokey sorta group where serious responses aren't the norm, but I do think in this instance it'd probably be appropriate for them to be less ambiguous on their stance just to clear the air here.

That's just my 2 cents.