you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 4 days ago (1 child)

My favourite example:

The en-dash – used for interjections, among other things – has been a staple of prose for a long time. Equally, it has been used in corporate communications attempting to sound formal and educated – often wrong, to the point that I myself amn't sure any more whether I'm using it right at any given moment, or how it is different to the em-dash β€” even longer, yet less popular because MS Office doesn't automatically replace a - between words with it.

Is it any wonder, then, that machines trained both on prose and corporate slop produce a soup of words interspersed with en-dashes – whether they make sense or not?

So when I use it, because I got used to it before the machines appropriated it, and people take it as indicator that my slop is artificial, I always get a little sad. I'm not concerned about AI taking my job, but I do worry that it may be taking my hobby:

Writing long, rambling comments of questionable quality on social media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago* (1 child)

    You didn't use the en-dash in like casual communication i bet, I think that's what is a giveaway

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (1 child)

    I do though. Like, I don't think I really have a separate mode of "casual communication" aside from using abbreviations (idk, imo, tbh) that I wouldn't use in formal contexts. This is just how I talk, including occasionally rambling. I'm aware that I'm not "normal" in that sense – I'm guessing it's part of my neuro-fuckery complex – but I don't think it's fair to arbitrarily brand weirdnesses as symptoms of AI-slop.

    My slop is 100% organic, manually produced by a moderately sized non-model fed with mediocre food instead of mediocre data and frankly quite undertrained.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments