you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 week ago (1 child)

That's... Not how any of that works?! You can be anti chat bot llm, anti anti ai mob hater, and pro llm science and research bot.

There's more to the tech then just the chat bots the anti ai mob dipshits all seem to think of when llms come up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    That’s exactly how that works lmao. “Anti” means “opposite”, not some neutral third thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    anti-anti-AI ≠ pro-AI, it assumes there's only anti-AI and pro-AI and nothing in between.
    And the wording was clearly about the anti-AI mob as opposed to people who understand the dangers and benefits of AI. It's similar to the difference between a Gamer™ and a gamer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    The user is not in between, they’re pro AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    So? That has nothing to do with the argument at hand, it's an ad hominem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago*

    You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment?

    I… disagree. That would be directly related.

    And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here.

    Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet.

  • source
  • parent