▲ 469 ▼ YouTuber Hank Green Is Facing a Fan Revolt Over His AI Use (gizmodo.com) submitted 1 week ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 436 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 child) The user is not in between, they’re pro AI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 child) So? That has nothing to do with the argument at hand, it's an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago* You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment? I… disagree. That would be directly related. And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here. Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 child) So? That has nothing to do with the argument at hand, it's an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago* You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment? I… disagree. That would be directly related. And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here. Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago* You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment? I… disagree. That would be directly related. And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here. Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet. permalink fedilink source parent