105
In Star Wars, what would it mean "to bring balance to The Force?" (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
109 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So the Messiah in Star Wars is supposed "to bring balance to The Force," but I never understood what it meant.

Star Wars is extremely dualistic--there is a good side and an evil side, a light side and a dark side, the Jedi and the Sith. Every plotline is based around a manichean struggle where only one side can win by annihilating the other.

The "good side", the Jedi, are explicitly looking a savior to provide "balance" while at the same time imposing all sorts of restrictions on which force powers are allowed and which aren't. For an order whose messiah is based on Taoist equilibrium, they are positively Christian in their obsession with purity.

I think there is an implicit subtextual critique of the Jedi Order in the prequels that they incompetent, as you might expect from the leaders of a theocracy, but that's about as far as it goes.

I think the closest we get to ANY real discussion of balance is Luke's vision on Degobah, where he must see himself as potentially Darth Vader, which can be interpreted as an attempt towards wholeness OR as a warning to not stray into evil.

Can anyone square this circle?

Edit: It's funny to me that there are more comments than upvotes. People want to share. I love it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What is the "light side" of the Force if not Jedi propaganda establishing themselves as the only morally correct force users in the galaxy? Who is to say which parts of the force are good and which are evil? The failing of the Jedi isn't that they assumed they were completely on the right side, but that the force has "sides" at all. The dark side exists in all living things, because the Force exists in all living things. To deny a part of the Force is imbalance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I think you're still looking at the Force like it's a traditional dualistic phenomenon like we're used to in real-world philosophy, like yin and yang, there can be no light without darkness, etc. But the sides of the Force don't work that way despite their "light" and "dark" descriptors. The light side is the natural and balanced state. The dark side is an aberration.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    I think about it in neither way. My point is that the descriptors of "light" and "dark" are our own (or the Jedis' own) moralizations mapped crudely onto the nature of the universe. The Jedi describing themselves as "light" and others as "dark" is a recursive definition of morality and it leads to moral rot, because people start to believe that the rules handed down by the Jedi are actually morally perfect, and above question. It is definitionally authoritarian.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    @queerlilhayseed @bjoern_tantau I think I'm okay with calling the side that uses technology to destroy entire planets "the bad guys." Your Sith mileage may vary.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •