you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you spend an evening in talking with an AI instead of streaming a movie from Netflix in 4k you'd have used less energy. Which would be still less than just the gas used to drive a few miles away for a night out.

And all data center usage is significantly less than something like A/C usage (which is likely to be increasing as temps increase).

There's a lot of legitimate grievances and concerns about AI — just today I was seeing a mathematician having an identity crisis in response to the unrelenting solving of open questions, something probably every field will soon struggle with adapting to — but the inflated perception of the environmental impacts means that so much less public attention is being spent on the actual culprits and possible solutions thereof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Is that what Ai told you? Because that is complete bullshit.

    Just taking to Ai doesn't use that much energy, except unless you let it make complicated code, but the energy it took for training the LLM's for your evening conversation took so much energy, resources and caused so much pollution, you could fly an airplane around the world for an entire year and still pollute the earth less.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago

    Hahaha — wait, do you think that the models take more energy to train than the cumulative amount used to serve them for inference across the lifetime of the model?

    And if not, then what you are saying is effectively gibberish as any reasonable assessment would need to divide the training cost across all post-trained inference. So if it was only 50% the lifetime inference usage, it'd be a 1.5x multiplier to that I said above, which doesn't change either the Netflix 4k or gas mileage points.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    There should be solar panels on all the roofs to help offset aircon use etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I have solar panels on my roof, why don't you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    For me its mostly the cost to benefit ratio given my current electricity prices. At current prices I'm not even sure I'd break even financially for my maintenaince costs of solar (like battery replacement) versus just paying my utility bill. As energy prices change that might change but currently it doesn't make sense for me, i still have a mortgage to pay and other major repairs to do to my house and ideally id have to prematurely redo the roof before installing solar.

  • source
  • parent