you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 113 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I realised it's all fake anyways when my back went out and I was unable to walk for 3 years while I was on the wait list for surgery (I'm ok now).

I went from high credit with a decent paying but physical job to unemployed and no longer able up work in my industry. My partner had a few months of unemployment at the same time and I wasn't able to pay my $11k credit card debt and he couldn't pay his $20k debt. We borrowed money from my younger brother to pay rent for a few months.

Spoke to a free financial councillor, she talked to the banks for us and they happily just waived both debts. She told us to ignore both of our zip and afterpay debts, and not to reply to their debt collectors. And just like that we were debt free after owing 40k between us.

Came out the other side better off financially even though our credit score has tanked. And even though I don't earn an income now or have any debt/credit, my credit score keeps rising?

Shits made up and the numbers don't matter.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I'm curious how any bank would "happily" waive a debt of tens of thousands of dollars, just by being asked. "Happily", yet they still send their debt collectors? I don't think I understand. 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    The debt collectors were for zip and afterpay.

    My partner's credit card debt was forgiven, I think the financial councillor was able to prove that he'd paid more over the lifetime of the debt in interest and repayments than the debt was worth, then proved our inability to make more repayments. She told me mine would have a bigger impact on our credit scores because it was written off by the bank rather than forgiven, but we don't plan on taking out any more debt, that doesn't really matter.

    The "happily" was a little facetious, the bank I was with was actually quite rude and difficult to work with lol. I'd had issues with them being unprofessional and straight up lying to me in the past and closed all other accounts. The credit card was still open though because it was taking time to pay off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Please ELI5 the terms "zip and afterpay" for those of us unfamiliar with them. I think I can guess the meaning from context, but would like to be sure. TIA

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    "buy now pay later" schemes. They are basically a credit card where you pay in instalments rather than a minimum monthly repayment like a credit card. Technically not lines of credit so they skirt around lending laws and can be given out to more people, but it also means they can't do much to recover the debt if it goes bad. Which is why the financial councillor told us we could just ignore them if we can't afford it anymore.

    (I was in my early 20s when I racked up those debts lol)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    TYVM for the explanation. I was not aware they weren't considered LoCs & people could just walk away from them. Seems kind of a risky business model in that case, so I wonder why there's been such an explosion of them over recent years. There must be some way they're able to protect themselves from that.

    Ah, well - another rainy day research project to throw on the pile if I'm so inclined.

    Thanks again for the reply!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    Haha well, from what I've heard, you're not technically supposed to walk away from them but they don't have the same legal recourse as banks so they just sell to debt collectors as the default action when you don't pay.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago*

    There must be some way they're able to protect themselves from that.

    Remember in 2008 when it was found out that banks were trading bad debts as 'good' but then It exploded in their face and caused a global recession, but the banks were 'too big to fail' so they were all bailed out by tax payers and only one guy saw any prison time, so they can claim being tough on crime?

    Yeah... i dont know why they keep doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    Here in Australia it's basically a myth.

    There's two agencies that keep track of what debts you have, and whether you're behind on your payments or whatever.

    The "score" is just an effort to reduce that information to a single number, but lenders are interested in the file, not the score.

    For example, the file might show that your score is good, but if half a dozen lenders have requested your file in the last 2 weeks that indicates that you're desperate for finance, but 6 other lenders have found a reason not to give you any money.

    Lenders are in the business of lending money. If you need to borrow $100k to buy a $500k house, any lender will be happy to give you the money.

    Basically, your score doesnt matter just be sensible with your finances.

  • source
  • parent