you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

What a bullshit arguments.

Decl. ¶¶ 19; Doe 4 Decl. ¶¶ 11. The monitoring program—announced internally as the “Model Capability Initiative”—thus captured not only employees’ work output but also their protected-leave and medical activity.

Literally in the court case papers.
source: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.1.0.pdf

You will now say this is not true ? You're AI enthusiast, Meta employee or something ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago

    I literally said that Meta was firing people for protected leave, disabilities, and medical issues. What I was denying is that they were firing people on the basis of "pre-diagnoses." All the complaints in the lawsuit are based on diagnoses that employees disclosed to Meta. I think that's shitty and illegal, but I don't think there is evidence that Meta is acquiring undisclosed medical information about their employees and using that for layoffs.

  • source
  • parent