394
What's something you no longer buy due to intrusive, insidious technology being added into it? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago* by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
347 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'll start: printers.

I bought an HP in March 2020 when my job went remote and HP bricked it remotely after only 100 pages because I wouldn't sign up for their subscription program. Ended up trashing a perfectly good printer.

Luckily my library's close by and I can print there remotely.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And software, while we're at it. Web plugins included. Basically just Facebook.

It could've stopped at "Lets people share things with friends and family" but they'll never be satisfied, until even if they have the entire world's money, attention, and data in their clutches.

What they've done to VR pisses me off to the core.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I never understood why people think VR can be a mass market product. It’s literally single user. It cannot be looked at by two people at the same time. Such a silly concept. It’s good for gaming, some work, robotics, remote access, etc. But mass market? iPhone-killer? Price-accessible to all? I don’t get it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Yeah I definitely think AR has a better opportunity for that... But then unfortunately we know what they do as soon as there's a camera attached to anything

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I sat in an uber the other day and the driver had meta ray ban sunglasses on. It was a very uncomfortable ride.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Honestly, using them as an uber driver might be the singular applicable use case in my eyes. It would be less intrusive than a 360 dash cam which I would want to use to protect myself. Accidents, false claims, etc. There is a lot that can go wrong and a lot of shitty people and a "paper trail" of events is VERY useful in court.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago*

    There is some open source software that is associated with Facebook, like compression with Zstandard, a very common and useful compression format. Don't care that it's from them in that case.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent