Valve is making its SteamOS Linux distribution compatible with more desktop hardware, including Nvidia graphics, so you can build your own Steam Machine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Plenty of the Linux YouTubers have been rolling their eyes when people treat SteamOS as an option, so it'll be interesting to watch their opinions 180 (or not).

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I roll my eyes when I see people saying they'll leave Windows when they can run SteamOS, considering there are other distros that are just as good or better. But the brand name recognition will definitely bring some people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Honestly, the arguing about distros is a big reason I don't move to Linux. I want something well supported and going to stick around, but all I ever hear are new names come up every 5 minutes and I can't help but assume contributors are just dropping off left and right for other distros.

    Steam being an actual company behind a distro gives at least an impression of support stability because they have a economical incentive to kind of keep it going.

    Is any of this actually true? No, and I know in my heart of the cards it isn't, but choice paralysis is getting real, and 30k distros to choose from don't help.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Canonical (Kubuntu) and Red Hat (Fedora, I suggest the KDE variant) are very big and old companies if that's what you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I would say debian is more equivalent to red hat being a core distro with no upstream while ubuntu (wierd to me you use kubuntu) uses debian as its upstream.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Debian is too slow with updates for gaming. Idk why not having an upstream is desired, SteamOS has Arch as an upstream. And I was suggesting Red Hat the company and Fedora KDE the distro.

    Why is it weird to prefer Kubuntu? Ubuntu is just not as good, it pushes Snaps harder, and it uses GNOME which I don't like either. I just like Kubuntu a lot more than Ubuntu, and I think many other gamers would agree. Also SteamOS uses KDE Plasma, so it's the same (except Kubuntu is more up to date, especially with Backports)

    I think Kubuntu should be the more popular one, and Ubuntu should be the one that is weird to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Its not wierd to prefer kubuntu. I don't prefer ubuntu or redhat its just that if your talk long time distros redhat and debian are some of the originals and ubuntu and such use them as a base like bazzite does with redhat. I say ubuntu because its the original and core canonical prodcut where as kubuntu is a variation. Your preferences were not wierd to me just the examples for someone worried about linux things not having a long enough and active enough history included an original, long term, core distro and then a more modern one that is downstream a core one. So it was a bit disparate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Oh they were looking for long term companies like Valve. So I suggested 2 companies.

    Steam being an actual company behind a distro gives at least an impression of support stability because they have a economical incentive to kind of keep it going.

    SteamOS is not a long term distro yet (especially considering v1 is not the same distro even though it has the same name)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Oh I can see using ubuntu over debian then. Still I would have went suse with redhat as they were really the two big enterprise ones. suse was actually the first linux in the aughts were a guy at my workplace through it on a laptop and basically everything worked. I mean it needed more specific drivers to be at its best but it was functional out the gate which was a big deal then.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    If you pick one of the core distros like (Fedora/Centos/RHEL/SuSE) or (Debian/Ubuntu) they have been around for decades and will be around for decades more. You don't have to pay attention to whatever trendy new Linux distro of the week has just come up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Yeah I was the same way. When you express that there’s too many options, and you don’t feel confident in selecting between them, a Linux enthusiast will always answer with a couple of options as if it is the final answer. Then someone always responds to that comment saying why the options are wrong and suggests others. Then someone else comments saying “Just use one of the ones that…” and doesn’t even stick to a specific distro but rather assumes you have the background knowledge to interpret and move forward based on a few key features.

    Eventually I just went with Mint and it went pretty well. Maybe I’ll switch, but the first try is the hardest and now I’m over that hurdle. Took years longer than it should have to start because people can’t help but argue in every comment chain.

    It’s definitely more attractive to use SteamOS because we know it’s an OS being designed for our general use case by a company that will support it meaningfully (as it already has been with Proton), and will continue to support it for a while. I’m sure a lot of users will switch OSes after a while, and existing Linux users should support the “first step” move to SteamOS knowing this.

    It’s probably not the best possible OS choice, but considering no one can agree that any option is the best choice, that doesn’t really factor into the decision.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Yeah... I have to sheepishly raise my hand as one of those people, previously. I finally converted last year because Valve was taking too long.

    My justification in waiting was that Valve (being behind Proton) would have a vested interest in making sure that support was top-notch, and not just best effort like you find in some of those niche gaming distros.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I already have my laptop on a different distro. I've been waiting for Steam OS for my gaming PC because it will be the easiest to game on, and for the guaranteed popularity it will be easy to find fixes for compatibility on any games and work well with my steam deck and it will have the biggest force behind it to have games work well on their Linux distro.

    You can roll your eyes all you want, but the fact is, you're going to find out you're kind of full of shit. Almost anyone who just wants a gaming PC without windows is going to use this distro and with valves resources and popularity it will be the best distro to game on. It would be a bit silly to think otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    SteamOS is already not the best gaming distro. Besides I never said it would be bad, I just said it's silly to be sticking with Windows 11 because you're waiting for SteamOS, and people have been saying this for years still waiting and waiting. It's less silly now that we might actually be closer to the release date.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I get it, though. The ease of updates is really enticing despite distros like bazzite being better in about every other way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I had assumed that Steam wouldn't do this, partly because they wouldn't want to deal with supporting Linux beginners, but they certainly have the resources to do so if they are willing to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Well previously it was the fact that it was very AMD centric. Linux can easily support anything of course. But for something that you just want to install and work. Steam OS was made with AMD in mind. You could get Nvidia to work with enough faphing about. But it was discouraged and not default. Enabling it by default could theoretically be less work for Valve. And a value add for the software as a whole.

    Before this, said YouTubers were right. It wasn't designed for General use and would cause a lot of problems for people just trying to get into it. Valve changing their support absolutely will change all of this. But it was never guaranteed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    I don't know about youtubers, but as far as I know SteamOS wasn't meant to be installed on non-deck devices, being distributed only as updates (not sure how those work) and recovery images for reinstalling on your deck, with no support or even instructions for installing it elsewhere.

    It's not about SteamOS being stupid, it's about it not even being meant to be an option - it had less support than those "random" other distros.

  • source
  • parent