you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If immigrants are employed then isn't that a job someone else could be doing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    "Jobs" are not a finite resource. That's just the broken window fallacy with a dash of bigotry.

    Or from a macro-economic view, since immigrants are also consumers, studies typically show that immigrants increase aggregate demand for jobs more than they increase aggregate supply.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Do the jobs that are taken by immigrants create jobs in the same field that the person who lost the job can be employed in? Because it creating a job in some other unrelated field doesn't really help the original person. Nor does the line for someone going up necessarily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    It's important here to clarify, what do you mean by immigrant? Like do H1B status people who live in the country count? Because I can kind of understand you if that's what you're talking about.

    If your're talking about migrant people who get desperately exploited then honestly fuck off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Sometimes we have to choose between someone who looks different earning a living wage, or Jeff Bezos having a slightly nicer trim on his yacht before the inevitable consequences of his choices cacth up with him. We just can't have both.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Why does immigrant mean someone who looks different? That seems like a strange assumption imo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Why does immigrant mean someone who looks different? That seems like a strange assumption imo

    Fair question.

    Politicians talk as if immigration enforcement only affects immigrants. But the data shows that plenty of citizens who look vaguely foriegn suffer substantially.

    Citizens who look like immigrants end up living in fear - which could easily be seen as "by design" when compared to historic playbooks where intimidation and distraction were key components for awful people to stay in power.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Jobs are productive. Every person that is employed grows the economy, so every job done by an immigrant creates another job.

    AI has yet to be productive. Right now it's just destroying jobs. Nothing is created, except maybe data center construction jobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Jobs are productive. Every person that is employed grows the economy, so every job done by an immigrant creates another job.

    That sounds dubious to me. Is there a study or something to back up the idea of every immigrant job creating another job?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/the-labour-market-effects-of-immigration/

    Where do you think economic growth even comes from? It comes from labor! All of the value in the economy is created by labor, literally nothing would exist if it weren't for working people doing their jobs. Then, those same workers who created value with their labor are paid wages, and then they spend those wages to pay for food, housing, utilities, clothing, entertainment, etc etc.

    There's a reason so many countries are panicking about low birth rates. Population growth is critical for economic growth.

    By the way, you're the one making the claim that "both are bad" - why don't you have to show me a study or something to back up your idea?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    From your link

    It is not obvious from theory alone whether migration will have a positive or negative impact on the wages and job prospects of existing workers in the labour market, or no effect at all. Immigration affects the number of workers in the economy, increasing ‘labour supply’. This means there are more people looking for jobs.

    ?

    By the way, you’re the one making the claim that “both are bad” - why don’t you have to show me a study or something to back up your idea?

    I think people losing their jobs is bad. And again, from your own link...

    The number of jobs in the UK economy is not fixed. Migrants compete with existing workers in the UK for jobs, but they also cause the number of jobs to increase

    Low-wage workers are more likely to lose out from immigration, while medium and high-paid workers are more likely to gain, but the effects are small

    In general, workers in low-skilled occupations face more competition from migrants because the skills needed for those jobs are easier to acquire.

    And so on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    There's enough work to be done in this country that everyone should have the ability to place a job if they are willing and able. However capitalism demands artificial scarcity to maintain itself, so capitalists artificially restrict the amount of available positions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments