▲ 373 ▼ Plex price gouging any users they have left (lazysoci.al) submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by lazynooblet@lazysoci.al to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 187 comments fedilink hide all child comments I bought Plex pass years ago for £79. The new price of $749.99 is INSANE. No wonder all the cool people are using Jellyfin.
[–] Rudee@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 month ago (2 children) Was any justification provided for a nearly 10x price increase!? Glad I started with Jellyfin permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children) It's because lifetime licenses aren't sustainable. I'm surprised they still offer it. Plex is an actual company that has an office and employees, so they have recurring costs every month. A lot of people already have lifetime licenses that they're not likely to receive any more revenue from. It's likely they're increasing the price to help recoup costs or convince people to subscribe to a monthly subscription rather than get a lifetime license. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Banzai51@midwest.social 15 points 1 month ago Nah, they increased the cost to drive people to the monthly subscription. I'm guessing in a year or two they'll announce the lifetime subs have been revoked and everyone needs a monthly sub. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KssioAug@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago Not saying you're wrong, but I wonder how many people that were willing to pay 250 dollars for lifetime would actually pay more than 3 years of subscription. I believe most lifetime buyers do it for FOMO. They pay it believing that they won't ever need to worry about it again and that they're making a good or safe deal... but most of them won't be using Plex that much anyway. With this price hike Plex is basically killing the lifetime option. Sure, they might get more subscribers at first, but in the other hand they will also lose a lot of impulse buyers that will hardly pay them 250 dollars in monthly subscriptions at the long run. At least, that's what I think... permalink fedilink source parent [–] mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Why do they have an office and employees? It's a damn ffmpeg wrapper. They're already charging comparible amounts as Netflix but they don't do half the things that Netflix does. $750 at $10/month is over 6 years. That's more than double what is reasonable. If I pay for 3 years of software development, shouldn't I be allowed to keep the software? Anyways, I use Jellyfin and donate to their development. EDIT: meant years not months permalink fedilink source parent [+] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] fbn@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 month ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dan@upvote.au 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children) It's because lifetime licenses aren't sustainable. I'm surprised they still offer it. Plex is an actual company that has an office and employees, so they have recurring costs every month. A lot of people already have lifetime licenses that they're not likely to receive any more revenue from. It's likely they're increasing the price to help recoup costs or convince people to subscribe to a monthly subscription rather than get a lifetime license. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Banzai51@midwest.social 15 points 1 month ago Nah, they increased the cost to drive people to the monthly subscription. I'm guessing in a year or two they'll announce the lifetime subs have been revoked and everyone needs a monthly sub. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KssioAug@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago Not saying you're wrong, but I wonder how many people that were willing to pay 250 dollars for lifetime would actually pay more than 3 years of subscription. I believe most lifetime buyers do it for FOMO. They pay it believing that they won't ever need to worry about it again and that they're making a good or safe deal... but most of them won't be using Plex that much anyway. With this price hike Plex is basically killing the lifetime option. Sure, they might get more subscribers at first, but in the other hand they will also lose a lot of impulse buyers that will hardly pay them 250 dollars in monthly subscriptions at the long run. At least, that's what I think... permalink fedilink source parent [–] mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Why do they have an office and employees? It's a damn ffmpeg wrapper. They're already charging comparible amounts as Netflix but they don't do half the things that Netflix does. $750 at $10/month is over 6 years. That's more than double what is reasonable. If I pay for 3 years of software development, shouldn't I be allowed to keep the software? Anyways, I use Jellyfin and donate to their development. EDIT: meant years not months permalink fedilink source parent [+] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 15 points 1 month ago Nah, they increased the cost to drive people to the monthly subscription. I'm guessing in a year or two they'll announce the lifetime subs have been revoked and everyone needs a monthly sub. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KssioAug@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago Not saying you're wrong, but I wonder how many people that were willing to pay 250 dollars for lifetime would actually pay more than 3 years of subscription. I believe most lifetime buyers do it for FOMO. They pay it believing that they won't ever need to worry about it again and that they're making a good or safe deal... but most of them won't be using Plex that much anyway. With this price hike Plex is basically killing the lifetime option. Sure, they might get more subscribers at first, but in the other hand they will also lose a lot of impulse buyers that will hardly pay them 250 dollars in monthly subscriptions at the long run. At least, that's what I think... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Why do they have an office and employees? It's a damn ffmpeg wrapper. They're already charging comparible amounts as Netflix but they don't do half the things that Netflix does. $750 at $10/month is over 6 years. That's more than double what is reasonable. If I pay for 3 years of software development, shouldn't I be allowed to keep the software? Anyways, I use Jellyfin and donate to their development. EDIT: meant years not months permalink fedilink source parent