▲ 354 ▼ Safe firearm storage may reduce blood lead levels in children (www.brown.edu) submitted 1 month ago by ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world 64 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/50832775
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Aren't expanding bullets horrible and should be illegal? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) No. They keep the projectile from over-penetrating the intended target. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) Isn't it better to have penetration without a bunch of shards? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Most traditional hollowpoints aren't designed to break apart into shrapnel. They're designed to expand in a controlled manner. The FBI protocol is that it should expand after passing through four layers of cloth (denim, fleece, cotton, and something else), then penetrate between 12 and 18 inches through standardized ballistics gel. A non expanding bullet might get double that much penetration if it doesn't start tumbling. Projectiles designed for large, dangerous game are designed for no expansion and maximum penetration. It all depends on what the goal is. There's a lot of youtube where people have put that kind of stuff to the test if you want to dig. There are a few results out there that are non-intuitive. For example, a regular 38 special hollow point out of a modern revolver often doesn't get enough velocity to expand, so the cavity will fill up with cloth and over penetrate the gel even though it's substantially less powerful than a 9mm. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) No. They keep the projectile from over-penetrating the intended target. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) Isn't it better to have penetration without a bunch of shards? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Most traditional hollowpoints aren't designed to break apart into shrapnel. They're designed to expand in a controlled manner. The FBI protocol is that it should expand after passing through four layers of cloth (denim, fleece, cotton, and something else), then penetrate between 12 and 18 inches through standardized ballistics gel. A non expanding bullet might get double that much penetration if it doesn't start tumbling. Projectiles designed for large, dangerous game are designed for no expansion and maximum penetration. It all depends on what the goal is. There's a lot of youtube where people have put that kind of stuff to the test if you want to dig. There are a few results out there that are non-intuitive. For example, a regular 38 special hollow point out of a modern revolver often doesn't get enough velocity to expand, so the cavity will fill up with cloth and over penetrate the gel even though it's substantially less powerful than a 9mm. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) Isn't it better to have penetration without a bunch of shards? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Most traditional hollowpoints aren't designed to break apart into shrapnel. They're designed to expand in a controlled manner. The FBI protocol is that it should expand after passing through four layers of cloth (denim, fleece, cotton, and something else), then penetrate between 12 and 18 inches through standardized ballistics gel. A non expanding bullet might get double that much penetration if it doesn't start tumbling. Projectiles designed for large, dangerous game are designed for no expansion and maximum penetration. It all depends on what the goal is. There's a lot of youtube where people have put that kind of stuff to the test if you want to dig. There are a few results out there that are non-intuitive. For example, a regular 38 special hollow point out of a modern revolver often doesn't get enough velocity to expand, so the cavity will fill up with cloth and over penetrate the gel even though it's substantially less powerful than a 9mm. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Most traditional hollowpoints aren't designed to break apart into shrapnel. They're designed to expand in a controlled manner. The FBI protocol is that it should expand after passing through four layers of cloth (denim, fleece, cotton, and something else), then penetrate between 12 and 18 inches through standardized ballistics gel. A non expanding bullet might get double that much penetration if it doesn't start tumbling. Projectiles designed for large, dangerous game are designed for no expansion and maximum penetration. It all depends on what the goal is. There's a lot of youtube where people have put that kind of stuff to the test if you want to dig. There are a few results out there that are non-intuitive. For example, a regular 38 special hollow point out of a modern revolver often doesn't get enough velocity to expand, so the cavity will fill up with cloth and over penetrate the gel even though it's substantially less powerful than a 9mm. permalink fedilink source parent