▲ 568 ▼ Tesla on Autopilot Smashes Straight Through Garage Door, Driver Says (autos.yahoo.com) submitted 1 month ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 134 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) It's because it adds nothing to the discussion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 month ago (1 child) No it adds precision and accuracy to the words used. These things matter when it comes to forming specific meanings in a purely text-based environment where people share little (or none at all) common understanding or biases. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] foo@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago In your initial response, you acknowledged that you understood what was meant by "sensors" in the context of the comment, but then the rest of your response was dismissive in tone, and implied that you believe their statement to be incorrect despite your previous acknowledgement. Your follow-up responses are doubling-down on this. As others have pointed out, arguing about the canonical definition of the word "sensor" is not adding anything to the discussion around the potential cause of the collision. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 month ago (1 child) No it adds precision and accuracy to the words used. These things matter when it comes to forming specific meanings in a purely text-based environment where people share little (or none at all) common understanding or biases. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] foo@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago In your initial response, you acknowledged that you understood what was meant by "sensors" in the context of the comment, but then the rest of your response was dismissive in tone, and implied that you believe their statement to be incorrect despite your previous acknowledgement. Your follow-up responses are doubling-down on this. As others have pointed out, arguing about the canonical definition of the word "sensor" is not adding anything to the discussion around the potential cause of the collision. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] foo@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago In your initial response, you acknowledged that you understood what was meant by "sensors" in the context of the comment, but then the rest of your response was dismissive in tone, and implied that you believe their statement to be incorrect despite your previous acknowledgement. Your follow-up responses are doubling-down on this. As others have pointed out, arguing about the canonical definition of the word "sensor" is not adding anything to the discussion around the potential cause of the collision. permalink fedilink source parent