▲ 138 ▼ New youtube music desktop app released! [Release v2.0.2 · th-ch/youtube-music] (github.com) submitted 2 years ago by mambabasa@slrpnk.net to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 comments fedilink hide all child comments This app has an easy downloader of music and music albums from Youtube Music, so it's definitely an awesome piracy tool.
[–] far_university1990@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) CLI>GUI permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gaael@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children) Nah, it's a matter of personnal preferences and use case. I love CLI mainly because it allows me to sceipt suff, but lots of people don't mind actually seeing what they are doing and clicking on stuff to achieve it. It's a good news there are piracy tools with a CLI, makes it more accessible to more people - and we should rejoice about it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago Executable with GUI and supplied CLI executable. Best of both worlds. permalink fedilink source parent [–] far_university1990@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago For lots of archiving you want scripting. Same for whole albums of songs (i assume every song one item). That is why cli>gui. In other use cases gui is better (complex video editing via ffmpeg alone would be interesting for example). And then there is jdownloader :( Imo, the more complex and visual a task, the more likely it is for a gui to be preferable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gaael@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children) Nah, it's a matter of personnal preferences and use case. I love CLI mainly because it allows me to sceipt suff, but lots of people don't mind actually seeing what they are doing and clicking on stuff to achieve it. It's a good news there are piracy tools with a CLI, makes it more accessible to more people - and we should rejoice about it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago Executable with GUI and supplied CLI executable. Best of both worlds. permalink fedilink source parent [–] far_university1990@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago For lots of archiving you want scripting. Same for whole albums of songs (i assume every song one item). That is why cli>gui. In other use cases gui is better (complex video editing via ffmpeg alone would be interesting for example). And then there is jdownloader :( Imo, the more complex and visual a task, the more likely it is for a gui to be preferable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago Executable with GUI and supplied CLI executable. Best of both worlds. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] far_university1990@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago For lots of archiving you want scripting. Same for whole albums of songs (i assume every song one item). That is why cli>gui. In other use cases gui is better (complex video editing via ffmpeg alone would be interesting for example). And then there is jdownloader :( Imo, the more complex and visual a task, the more likely it is for a gui to be preferable. permalink fedilink source parent