▲ 1040 ▼ Hackers Simply Asked Meta AI to Give Them Access to High-Profile Instagram Accounts. It Worked (www.404media.co) submitted 1 month ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 131 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 258 points 1 month ago (10 children) Why would the LLM tool have access to send recovery emails to non account verified emails at all? That’s insane. permalink fedilink source hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 137 points 1 month ago Because AI bros are incredibly deluded about both the capability of AI, and by extension their own capabilities using AI> permalink fedilink source parent [–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 month ago (3 children) should’ve asked it to delete the database instead, why else would it have that level of permissions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago Oh, man, I hope someone tries this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 month ago Heh. Watched an old episode of Scorpion yesterday. The one with the armed hostage-takers who just had the one demand to the social media data mining company, to delete all the data they've mined. I amused myself a lot, by uttering "I like these guys". permalink fedilink source parent [–] rnkn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) Little Tommy Drop Tables. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Drop Table suddenly becomes the newest baby name fad. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago Who else is going to have access to it when you keep laying off all the people? permalink fedilink source parent [–] guitarfosec@infosec.pub 42 points 1 month ago (2 children) Because one of the biggest companies on the planet that has issues with account takeovers clearly has no internal red team working on this stuff. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 child) I guarantee they do have a red team that most likely flagged this as an obvious and severe risk. It was ignored by suits experiencing AI psychosis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 4grams@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* I don’t know, more and more of those teams these days are being headed up by the same folks. Most on the ground, in the weeds know what not to do but the ivory tower keeps building more and more floors without ever updating the foundation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dasus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago "one of" permalink fedilink source parent [+] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago Let's mix these chemicals and see what happens. No funds for lab coats or protective glasses. We got a bottom line to feed. permalink fedilink source parent [–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago (1 child) This isn't even a hack, it's just poorly written endpoints. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children) Would you consider phreaking equivalent to hacking? This is AI phreaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) It's not phreaking. Social engineering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info). permalink fedilink source parent [–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago So, I'm currently developing a chatbot for my company. If an LLM needs to do something, a developer must build a tool. It just so happens that this tool that was built did not take traditional security into account. Really it should only be using the tools already built for users, but it seems the Jr. Devs that have been replacing seniors do not have the sensibilities yet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago Kinda. If you designed a publicly addressable system since 1985 and didn’t design it for security then you’re asking for it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) TIL about phreaking permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Then this is also probably new to you The Anarchist Cookbook permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago It's not insane. It's advanced! permalink fedilink source parent [–] hightrix@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago Hold on, do you expect Facebook to pay a human to deal with the inventory? Come on now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (4 children) Recently I had to cancel an order. The support for the company was an LLM bot. I accidentally mistyped a number in the order id. It accepted it anyways refunded every order on my account that includes the product I wished to cancel. I tired to get to a human to correct the mistake and couldn't their phone number is an LLM bot their only chat is an LLM bot. It use to not be. But now I'm sitting here the order in my hand cause the bot didn't cancel it. But like 30 orders from the last few years have all been refunded to me. I tried to reach em a few more times but couldn't and it's been like a month. I just have like 2 grand usd that I shouldn't and no way to give it back. So that's fun. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago I wonder how long you need to keep that money aside before you can spend it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago Would sincerely love to know the name of the company. You know, to avoid them. Yup. I’m sure that’s the reason. permalink fedilink source parent [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago That's amazing Maybe I ought to be taking more advantage of this era of rampant incompetence permalink fedilink source parent [–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) I hope you saved what you could from that exchange, as well the attempts to contact them. If they ever notice, their AI mistake will become your problem to deal with, (and the kind of news story to end up on a Steve Lehto video). If that happened to me, I'd have a chat with my bank, "please help me return this money to where it came from, it was payed in error. They have no way to contact a human and I don't want them to accuse me of fraud down the line". permalink fedilink source parent [–] rnkn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago I tried this and couldn't get it to work. Disappointed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 137 points 1 month ago Because AI bros are incredibly deluded about both the capability of AI, and by extension their own capabilities using AI> permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 month ago (3 children) should’ve asked it to delete the database instead, why else would it have that level of permissions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago Oh, man, I hope someone tries this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 month ago Heh. Watched an old episode of Scorpion yesterday. The one with the armed hostage-takers who just had the one demand to the social media data mining company, to delete all the data they've mined. I amused myself a lot, by uttering "I like these guys". permalink fedilink source parent [–] rnkn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) Little Tommy Drop Tables. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Drop Table suddenly becomes the newest baby name fad. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago Oh, man, I hope someone tries this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 month ago Heh. Watched an old episode of Scorpion yesterday. The one with the armed hostage-takers who just had the one demand to the social media data mining company, to delete all the data they've mined. I amused myself a lot, by uttering "I like these guys". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rnkn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) Little Tommy Drop Tables. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Drop Table suddenly becomes the newest baby name fad. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Drop Table suddenly becomes the newest baby name fad. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago Who else is going to have access to it when you keep laying off all the people? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] guitarfosec@infosec.pub 42 points 1 month ago (2 children) Because one of the biggest companies on the planet that has issues with account takeovers clearly has no internal red team working on this stuff. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 child) I guarantee they do have a red team that most likely flagged this as an obvious and severe risk. It was ignored by suits experiencing AI psychosis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 4grams@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* I don’t know, more and more of those teams these days are being headed up by the same folks. Most on the ground, in the weeds know what not to do but the ivory tower keeps building more and more floors without ever updating the foundation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dasus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago "one of" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 child) I guarantee they do have a red team that most likely flagged this as an obvious and severe risk. It was ignored by suits experiencing AI psychosis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 4grams@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* I don’t know, more and more of those teams these days are being headed up by the same folks. Most on the ground, in the weeds know what not to do but the ivory tower keeps building more and more floors without ever updating the foundation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 4grams@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* I don’t know, more and more of those teams these days are being headed up by the same folks. Most on the ground, in the weeds know what not to do but the ivory tower keeps building more and more floors without ever updating the foundation. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago Let's mix these chemicals and see what happens. No funds for lab coats or protective glasses. We got a bottom line to feed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago Let's mix these chemicals and see what happens. No funds for lab coats or protective glasses. We got a bottom line to feed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago (1 child) This isn't even a hack, it's just poorly written endpoints. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children) Would you consider phreaking equivalent to hacking? This is AI phreaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) It's not phreaking. Social engineering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info). permalink fedilink source parent [–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago So, I'm currently developing a chatbot for my company. If an LLM needs to do something, a developer must build a tool. It just so happens that this tool that was built did not take traditional security into account. Really it should only be using the tools already built for users, but it seems the Jr. Devs that have been replacing seniors do not have the sensibilities yet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago Kinda. If you designed a publicly addressable system since 1985 and didn’t design it for security then you’re asking for it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) TIL about phreaking permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Then this is also probably new to you The Anarchist Cookbook permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children) Would you consider phreaking equivalent to hacking? This is AI phreaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) It's not phreaking. Social engineering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info). permalink fedilink source parent [–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago So, I'm currently developing a chatbot for my company. If an LLM needs to do something, a developer must build a tool. It just so happens that this tool that was built did not take traditional security into account. Really it should only be using the tools already built for users, but it seems the Jr. Devs that have been replacing seniors do not have the sensibilities yet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago Kinda. If you designed a publicly addressable system since 1985 and didn’t design it for security then you’re asking for it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) TIL about phreaking permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Then this is also probably new to you The Anarchist Cookbook permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) It's not phreaking. Social engineering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info). permalink fedilink source parent [–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago So, I'm currently developing a chatbot for my company. If an LLM needs to do something, a developer must build a tool. It just so happens that this tool that was built did not take traditional security into account. Really it should only be using the tools already built for users, but it seems the Jr. Devs that have been replacing seniors do not have the sensibilities yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago So, I'm currently developing a chatbot for my company. If an LLM needs to do something, a developer must build a tool. It just so happens that this tool that was built did not take traditional security into account. Really it should only be using the tools already built for users, but it seems the Jr. Devs that have been replacing seniors do not have the sensibilities yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago Kinda. If you designed a publicly addressable system since 1985 and didn’t design it for security then you’re asking for it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) TIL about phreaking permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Then this is also probably new to you The Anarchist Cookbook permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Then this is also probably new to you The Anarchist Cookbook permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago It's not insane. It's advanced! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago Hold on, do you expect Facebook to pay a human to deal with the inventory? Come on now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (4 children) Recently I had to cancel an order. The support for the company was an LLM bot. I accidentally mistyped a number in the order id. It accepted it anyways refunded every order on my account that includes the product I wished to cancel. I tired to get to a human to correct the mistake and couldn't their phone number is an LLM bot their only chat is an LLM bot. It use to not be. But now I'm sitting here the order in my hand cause the bot didn't cancel it. But like 30 orders from the last few years have all been refunded to me. I tried to reach em a few more times but couldn't and it's been like a month. I just have like 2 grand usd that I shouldn't and no way to give it back. So that's fun. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago I wonder how long you need to keep that money aside before you can spend it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago Would sincerely love to know the name of the company. You know, to avoid them. Yup. I’m sure that’s the reason. permalink fedilink source parent [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago That's amazing Maybe I ought to be taking more advantage of this era of rampant incompetence permalink fedilink source parent [–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) I hope you saved what you could from that exchange, as well the attempts to contact them. If they ever notice, their AI mistake will become your problem to deal with, (and the kind of news story to end up on a Steve Lehto video). If that happened to me, I'd have a chat with my bank, "please help me return this money to where it came from, it was payed in error. They have no way to contact a human and I don't want them to accuse me of fraud down the line". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago I wonder how long you need to keep that money aside before you can spend it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago Would sincerely love to know the name of the company. You know, to avoid them. Yup. I’m sure that’s the reason. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago That's amazing Maybe I ought to be taking more advantage of this era of rampant incompetence permalink fedilink source parent
[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) I hope you saved what you could from that exchange, as well the attempts to contact them. If they ever notice, their AI mistake will become your problem to deal with, (and the kind of news story to end up on a Steve Lehto video). If that happened to me, I'd have a chat with my bank, "please help me return this money to where it came from, it was payed in error. They have no way to contact a human and I don't want them to accuse me of fraud down the line". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rnkn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago I tried this and couldn't get it to work. Disappointed. permalink fedilink source parent