▲ 634 ▼ Microsoft revokes Office 2019 perpetual licenses, then edits their website to gaslight customers. (www.youtube.com) submitted 2 months ago by ExtremeDullard@piefed.social to c/fucksubscriptions@lemmy.world 102 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 8 points 2 months ago (1 child) The fact that you didn't donate any money or paid the devs doesn't mean everyone else did the same. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Let me reiterate: I don't give the slightest fraction of a fuck whether the devs were paid or not, nor about who did or didn't pay them. I'm not paying money for shit I don't own. Especially not if it can be taken away from me at any time by the asshats who 'sold' it to me. That's it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl -1 points 2 months ago* (2 children) You're using something that required someone else's time and knowledge. You're talking as if you're entitled to that without giving anything back in any way, shape of form. You're not, and quite honestly, you sound like a dick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) There is no obligation for anyone to pay for FOSS. The devs knowingly give their time in anticipation of nothing. Shaming someone for using it as per the license is ludicrous. Support if you want, but don't cry foul when the license is used as stipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 2 months ago Is that why they almost always have a donations link? Also, I'm not "shaming" them for not paying. I'm shaming them for acting like an entitled prick. permalink fedilink source parent [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child) How dare I take something that somebody freely offered! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn't exist. If you can't pay, you don't need to. But if you can donate, you should. Acting like an entitled brat makes 0 sense here. The devs don't owe you anything, amd you're talking as if it was their duty to give you free software. You sound like the annoying douche that opens a github issue and demands it to be fixed asap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn’t exist. Yes it would. Just maybe not developed as fast or as comprehensive. Lots of open source developers out there work completely for free, never seeing a single red cent for their efforts. Heck, I -- just barely, technically -- am one of them. I've made a couple PRs to fix issues in open source software. I never got paid for it. And I'm okay with that. If you're using some of the software I (very slightly) helped with and you didn't pay for it ... good for you! I hope you enjoy my bugfixes! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago You're literally disproving your own point. You're part of the reason foss software exists because "paying" for it has many forms. Collaborating is one of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Let me reiterate: I don't give the slightest fraction of a fuck whether the devs were paid or not, nor about who did or didn't pay them. I'm not paying money for shit I don't own. Especially not if it can be taken away from me at any time by the asshats who 'sold' it to me. That's it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl -1 points 2 months ago* (2 children) You're using something that required someone else's time and knowledge. You're talking as if you're entitled to that without giving anything back in any way, shape of form. You're not, and quite honestly, you sound like a dick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) There is no obligation for anyone to pay for FOSS. The devs knowingly give their time in anticipation of nothing. Shaming someone for using it as per the license is ludicrous. Support if you want, but don't cry foul when the license is used as stipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 2 months ago Is that why they almost always have a donations link? Also, I'm not "shaming" them for not paying. I'm shaming them for acting like an entitled prick. permalink fedilink source parent [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child) How dare I take something that somebody freely offered! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn't exist. If you can't pay, you don't need to. But if you can donate, you should. Acting like an entitled brat makes 0 sense here. The devs don't owe you anything, amd you're talking as if it was their duty to give you free software. You sound like the annoying douche that opens a github issue and demands it to be fixed asap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn’t exist. Yes it would. Just maybe not developed as fast or as comprehensive. Lots of open source developers out there work completely for free, never seeing a single red cent for their efforts. Heck, I -- just barely, technically -- am one of them. I've made a couple PRs to fix issues in open source software. I never got paid for it. And I'm okay with that. If you're using some of the software I (very slightly) helped with and you didn't pay for it ... good for you! I hope you enjoy my bugfixes! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago You're literally disproving your own point. You're part of the reason foss software exists because "paying" for it has many forms. Collaborating is one of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl -1 points 2 months ago* (2 children) You're using something that required someone else's time and knowledge. You're talking as if you're entitled to that without giving anything back in any way, shape of form. You're not, and quite honestly, you sound like a dick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) There is no obligation for anyone to pay for FOSS. The devs knowingly give their time in anticipation of nothing. Shaming someone for using it as per the license is ludicrous. Support if you want, but don't cry foul when the license is used as stipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 2 months ago Is that why they almost always have a donations link? Also, I'm not "shaming" them for not paying. I'm shaming them for acting like an entitled prick. permalink fedilink source parent [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child) How dare I take something that somebody freely offered! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn't exist. If you can't pay, you don't need to. But if you can donate, you should. Acting like an entitled brat makes 0 sense here. The devs don't owe you anything, amd you're talking as if it was their duty to give you free software. You sound like the annoying douche that opens a github issue and demands it to be fixed asap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn’t exist. Yes it would. Just maybe not developed as fast or as comprehensive. Lots of open source developers out there work completely for free, never seeing a single red cent for their efforts. Heck, I -- just barely, technically -- am one of them. I've made a couple PRs to fix issues in open source software. I never got paid for it. And I'm okay with that. If you're using some of the software I (very slightly) helped with and you didn't pay for it ... good for you! I hope you enjoy my bugfixes! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago You're literally disproving your own point. You're part of the reason foss software exists because "paying" for it has many forms. Collaborating is one of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) There is no obligation for anyone to pay for FOSS. The devs knowingly give their time in anticipation of nothing. Shaming someone for using it as per the license is ludicrous. Support if you want, but don't cry foul when the license is used as stipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 2 months ago Is that why they almost always have a donations link? Also, I'm not "shaming" them for not paying. I'm shaming them for acting like an entitled prick. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 2 months ago Is that why they almost always have a donations link? Also, I'm not "shaming" them for not paying. I'm shaming them for acting like an entitled prick. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child) How dare I take something that somebody freely offered! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn't exist. If you can't pay, you don't need to. But if you can donate, you should. Acting like an entitled brat makes 0 sense here. The devs don't owe you anything, amd you're talking as if it was their duty to give you free software. You sound like the annoying douche that opens a github issue and demands it to be fixed asap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn’t exist. Yes it would. Just maybe not developed as fast or as comprehensive. Lots of open source developers out there work completely for free, never seeing a single red cent for their efforts. Heck, I -- just barely, technically -- am one of them. I've made a couple PRs to fix issues in open source software. I never got paid for it. And I'm okay with that. If you're using some of the software I (very slightly) helped with and you didn't pay for it ... good for you! I hope you enjoy my bugfixes! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago You're literally disproving your own point. You're part of the reason foss software exists because "paying" for it has many forms. Collaborating is one of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn't exist. If you can't pay, you don't need to. But if you can donate, you should. Acting like an entitled brat makes 0 sense here. The devs don't owe you anything, amd you're talking as if it was their duty to give you free software. You sound like the annoying douche that opens a github issue and demands it to be fixed asap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn’t exist. Yes it would. Just maybe not developed as fast or as comprehensive. Lots of open source developers out there work completely for free, never seeing a single red cent for their efforts. Heck, I -- just barely, technically -- am one of them. I've made a couple PRs to fix issues in open source software. I never got paid for it. And I'm okay with that. If you're using some of the software I (very slightly) helped with and you didn't pay for it ... good for you! I hope you enjoy my bugfixes! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago You're literally disproving your own point. You're part of the reason foss software exists because "paying" for it has many forms. Collaborating is one of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) If everyone did the same thing, free open source software wouldn’t exist. Yes it would. Just maybe not developed as fast or as comprehensive. Lots of open source developers out there work completely for free, never seeing a single red cent for their efforts. Heck, I -- just barely, technically -- am one of them. I've made a couple PRs to fix issues in open source software. I never got paid for it. And I'm okay with that. If you're using some of the software I (very slightly) helped with and you didn't pay for it ... good for you! I hope you enjoy my bugfixes! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago You're literally disproving your own point. You're part of the reason foss software exists because "paying" for it has many forms. Collaborating is one of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago You're literally disproving your own point. You're part of the reason foss software exists because "paying" for it has many forms. Collaborating is one of them. permalink fedilink source parent