▲ 994 ▼ A security researcher says Microsoft secretly built a backdoor into BitLocker, releases an exploit to prove it (www.techspot.com) submitted 2 months ago by Itwasntme223@discuss.online to c/technology@lemmy.world 157 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 58 points 2 months ago (2 children) Microsoft is a malware developer, plain and simple. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 18 points 2 months ago (1 child) ig "Proprietary software is often malware" is kinda not a exaggeration. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'd phrase that "is malware until proven otherwise." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago btw i took that from GNU's project philosophy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Itwasntme223@discuss.online [S] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) They assumed they could get away with anything cause they had so much of a marketshare, imo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago They all assume that, you're absolutely right. Its up to us to teach them how wrong they might be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 18 points 2 months ago (1 child) ig "Proprietary software is often malware" is kinda not a exaggeration. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'd phrase that "is malware until proven otherwise." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago btw i took that from GNU's project philosophy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'd phrase that "is malware until proven otherwise." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago btw i took that from GNU's project philosophy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago btw i took that from GNU's project philosophy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Itwasntme223@discuss.online [S] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) They assumed they could get away with anything cause they had so much of a marketshare, imo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago They all assume that, you're absolutely right. Its up to us to teach them how wrong they might be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago They all assume that, you're absolutely right. Its up to us to teach them how wrong they might be. permalink fedilink source parent