▲ 1190 ▼ YouTube now (discuss.online) submitted 2 months ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (5 children) Youtube had a star rating system for videos? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 107 points 2 months ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago I'm sorry 🗿 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 60 points 2 months ago (5 children) Here's what a video page looked like back in 2003: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 months ago (2 children) I have my doubts a video could've had 14M views in 2003. Especially since it was launched in 2005. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 16 points 2 months ago I meant 2005. That was my bad. Evolution of dance, the most watched video of 2005 on the site, had over 20 million views by 2006. permalink fedilink source parent [–] maltasoron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago It looks like an edited screenshot, like "What if the Nixon-Kenny debate happened now?" permalink fedilink source parent [–] EmpatheticTeddyBear@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago <starts playing Weird Al's "Good Old Days"> permalink fedilink source parent [–] Furbag@pawb.social 3 points 2 months ago The old YT player was perfect and nobody will convince me otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago I was baby then 😁. It's kind of amazing how long people have been putting up with youtube, compared to other social media + SM adjacent sites. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tal@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) I think that 2026 is doing okay. https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/d7886499-5a38-4fc6-bf28-d350d836e6d5.png permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 point 2 months ago* But will your setup open the pod bay doors? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ApertureUA@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago where did you get a screenshot of my setup? permalink fedilink source parent [–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago Early on yeah, they replaced it with the thumbs up/down system since most star ratings were 1 or 5. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago They used to, and they currently do too, but the current one isn't meant to be an alternative to the like/dislike button like this portrays. It's most often in your feed, where occasionally it'll show a video to you, then give you a tiny light blue box beneath it saying "how good of a recommendation is this" or something along those lines, then you rate it so they can both make the algorithm better overall, and fine-tune yours even if you don't want to watch the video. (e.g. I might say "5 stars, this is a good recommendation," but never watch it just because I don't have the time. YouTube knows I like that topic now, just that I might not watch videos that are that long.) permalink fedilink source parent [–] eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago Eons ago, yes. It initially bothered me when they replaced it with thumbs up/down since I couldn't rank things with nuance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 107 points 2 months ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago I'm sorry 🗿 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 60 points 2 months ago (5 children) Here's what a video page looked like back in 2003: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 months ago (2 children) I have my doubts a video could've had 14M views in 2003. Especially since it was launched in 2005. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 16 points 2 months ago I meant 2005. That was my bad. Evolution of dance, the most watched video of 2005 on the site, had over 20 million views by 2006. permalink fedilink source parent [–] maltasoron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago It looks like an edited screenshot, like "What if the Nixon-Kenny debate happened now?" permalink fedilink source parent [–] EmpatheticTeddyBear@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago <starts playing Weird Al's "Good Old Days"> permalink fedilink source parent [–] Furbag@pawb.social 3 points 2 months ago The old YT player was perfect and nobody will convince me otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago I was baby then 😁. It's kind of amazing how long people have been putting up with youtube, compared to other social media + SM adjacent sites. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tal@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) I think that 2026 is doing okay. https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/d7886499-5a38-4fc6-bf28-d350d836e6d5.png permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 point 2 months ago* But will your setup open the pod bay doors? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ApertureUA@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago where did you get a screenshot of my setup? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 months ago (2 children) I have my doubts a video could've had 14M views in 2003. Especially since it was launched in 2005. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 16 points 2 months ago I meant 2005. That was my bad. Evolution of dance, the most watched video of 2005 on the site, had over 20 million views by 2006. permalink fedilink source parent [–] maltasoron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago It looks like an edited screenshot, like "What if the Nixon-Kenny debate happened now?" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 16 points 2 months ago I meant 2005. That was my bad. Evolution of dance, the most watched video of 2005 on the site, had over 20 million views by 2006. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] maltasoron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago It looks like an edited screenshot, like "What if the Nixon-Kenny debate happened now?" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EmpatheticTeddyBear@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago <starts playing Weird Al's "Good Old Days"> permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Furbag@pawb.social 3 points 2 months ago The old YT player was perfect and nobody will convince me otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago I was baby then 😁. It's kind of amazing how long people have been putting up with youtube, compared to other social media + SM adjacent sites. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) I think that 2026 is doing okay. https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/d7886499-5a38-4fc6-bf28-d350d836e6d5.png permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 point 2 months ago* But will your setup open the pod bay doors? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ApertureUA@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago where did you get a screenshot of my setup? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 point 2 months ago* But will your setup open the pod bay doors? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ApertureUA@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago where did you get a screenshot of my setup? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago Early on yeah, they replaced it with the thumbs up/down system since most star ratings were 1 or 5. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago They used to, and they currently do too, but the current one isn't meant to be an alternative to the like/dislike button like this portrays. It's most often in your feed, where occasionally it'll show a video to you, then give you a tiny light blue box beneath it saying "how good of a recommendation is this" or something along those lines, then you rate it so they can both make the algorithm better overall, and fine-tune yours even if you don't want to watch the video. (e.g. I might say "5 stars, this is a good recommendation," but never watch it just because I don't have the time. YouTube knows I like that topic now, just that I might not watch videos that are that long.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago Eons ago, yes. It initially bothered me when they replaced it with thumbs up/down since I couldn't rank things with nuance. permalink fedilink source parent