▲ 825 ▼ A judge has ruled Texas' abortion ban is too restrictive for women with pregnancy complications (apnews.com) submitted 3 years ago by Pips@lemmy.film to c/news@lemmy.world 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] CrazyEddie041@kbin.social 79 points 3 years ago (1 child) Texas' abortion ban is too restrictive for women with pregnancy complications FTFY permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 18 points 3 years ago (1 child) I think the judges said it exactly how they meant it unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] serinus@midwest.social 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) The "unfortunately" is weird. The judge is supposed to interpret law, not decide it. And he's determined that this law conflicts with inalienable rights in another law for a particular reason. I understand people think it's not broad enough, but more specific is more defensible, and more likely to stick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Dude, the entire state of womens reproductive rights in this country is unfortunate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 18 points 3 years ago (1 child) I think the judges said it exactly how they meant it unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] serinus@midwest.social 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) The "unfortunately" is weird. The judge is supposed to interpret law, not decide it. And he's determined that this law conflicts with inalienable rights in another law for a particular reason. I understand people think it's not broad enough, but more specific is more defensible, and more likely to stick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Dude, the entire state of womens reproductive rights in this country is unfortunate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] serinus@midwest.social 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) The "unfortunately" is weird. The judge is supposed to interpret law, not decide it. And he's determined that this law conflicts with inalienable rights in another law for a particular reason. I understand people think it's not broad enough, but more specific is more defensible, and more likely to stick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Dude, the entire state of womens reproductive rights in this country is unfortunate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Dude, the entire state of womens reproductive rights in this country is unfortunate. permalink fedilink source parent