you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

The "unfortunately" is weird. The judge is supposed to interpret law, not decide it. And he's determined that this law conflicts with inalienable rights in another law for a particular reason.

I understand people think it's not broad enough, but more specific is more defensible, and more likely to stick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments