you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 121 points 3 years ago (6 children)

I bet reddit paid for that article.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    They probably paid for the title but the article isn't actually that peachy, I'd say its assessment is accurate. The Reddit sub protest is over, and technically spez got his way, but the platform has been damaged and may recover or may begin to die out and be replaced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Of course it did, spez has been unsuccessfully trying to spin this. He assumed since he’s a sellout who has sex with cats, we’d all bend over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    ...what the hell am I looking at??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago

    I doubt it given the way the article ends- it suggests that while reddit's leadership got it's way, that the incident might still have damaged the platform's reputation and that in the long term reddit might not be successful in it's attempts to be profitable either. I'd imagine a paid article would have a more positive or confidence-inducing message than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Tell me you didn't read the article without telling me you didn't read the article

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments