you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

It's not preposterous, and might be enough to make these batteries usable on a massive scale...

As I wrote in other comments here in this post, the tech is not exactly new:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_redox_flow_battery
and it is e.g. in place in Sacramaneto, CA with a storage of 2 GWh and a maximum power of 200 MW.
Apparently it's working and just need to be scaled up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    They don't just need to work, they need to be economically viable.

    These batteries have active components, since they actually pump the electrolyte, and there's a fairly substantial level of degradation and corrosion, along with leaking across the membrane that leads to loss of capacity over time.

    If some of these problems can be reduced (like the article claims they do) then they're even more attractive.

    I really hope this helps with massively expanding renewables storage, because that's bastion holding up fossil fuels in electricity generation, and it will allow shutting down all those coal, gas, even nuclear plants!

  • source
  • parent