▲ 987 ▼ Good luck figuring it out since it also doesn’t come with man pages (lemmy.world) submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by cannedtuna@lemmy.world to c/memes@sopuli.xyz 184 comments fedilink hide all child comments Edit: As @bdonvr@thelemmy.club points out below This is just a mascot and is not a new logo The blog referencing Mozilla’s statement on the mascots gender says, (he/she/they/them/it), use whatever pronoun you prefer.
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) Awww bummer. I was excited for the NB fox. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WillFord27@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) The fox is schrodinger's gender so... they/them until proven guilty? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago that’s exactly it: in context, kit is a feature intended to be interpreted by the user; not a representation of a sentient character having made a conscious choice to be non-binary simply because of mozilla’s chosen pronouns and lack of gender expression permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WillFord27@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) The fox is schrodinger's gender so... they/them until proven guilty? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago that’s exactly it: in context, kit is a feature intended to be interpreted by the user; not a representation of a sentient character having made a conscious choice to be non-binary simply because of mozilla’s chosen pronouns and lack of gender expression permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago that’s exactly it: in context, kit is a feature intended to be interpreted by the user; not a representation of a sentient character having made a conscious choice to be non-binary simply because of mozilla’s chosen pronouns and lack of gender expression permalink fedilink source parent
