▲ 987 ▼ Good luck figuring it out since it also doesn’t come with man pages (lemmy.world) submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by cannedtuna@lemmy.world to c/memes@sopuli.xyz 184 comments fedilink hide all child comments Edit: As @bdonvr@thelemmy.club points out below This is just a mascot and is not a new logo The blog referencing Mozilla’s statement on the mascots gender says, (he/she/they/them/it), use whatever pronoun you prefer.
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 months ago (2 children) It isn't, though. They never said that the mascot was non-binary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] daggermoon@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) Awww bummer. I was excited for the NB fox. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WillFord27@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) The fox is schrodinger's gender so... they/them until proven guilty? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago that’s exactly it: in context, kit is a feature intended to be interpreted by the user; not a representation of a sentient character having made a conscious choice to be non-binary simply because of mozilla’s chosen pronouns and lack of gender expression permalink fedilink source parent [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 point 4 months ago* they do though via stating its pronouns - even including it, repeatedly referring to it even in their intro blog post as “they” but that’s because it’s a feature to increase the feeling friendliness of the browser by establishing personal connection via the application of any (or non-) gender by the user no matter their preference rather than intended as a portrayal of a sentient character having made a decision for themselves permalink fedilink source parent
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) Awww bummer. I was excited for the NB fox. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WillFord27@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) The fox is schrodinger's gender so... they/them until proven guilty? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago that’s exactly it: in context, kit is a feature intended to be interpreted by the user; not a representation of a sentient character having made a conscious choice to be non-binary simply because of mozilla’s chosen pronouns and lack of gender expression permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WillFord27@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) The fox is schrodinger's gender so... they/them until proven guilty? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago that’s exactly it: in context, kit is a feature intended to be interpreted by the user; not a representation of a sentient character having made a conscious choice to be non-binary simply because of mozilla’s chosen pronouns and lack of gender expression permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago that’s exactly it: in context, kit is a feature intended to be interpreted by the user; not a representation of a sentient character having made a conscious choice to be non-binary simply because of mozilla’s chosen pronouns and lack of gender expression permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 point 4 months ago* they do though via stating its pronouns - even including it, repeatedly referring to it even in their intro blog post as “they” but that’s because it’s a feature to increase the feeling friendliness of the browser by establishing personal connection via the application of any (or non-) gender by the user no matter their preference rather than intended as a portrayal of a sentient character having made a decision for themselves permalink fedilink source parent
