Yeah but they saved gaza!

Only they didnt. If anything their efforts have started to associate anti-genocide with a disaster like trump and practically guarantee people either switch off in disgust of their rethoric or just jump to the other side to avoid all the tankie bullshit.

The destruction of usaid alone will cause millions of preventable deaths including many kids. The stadium full of dead kids doesn’t care about your feelings

1. Organizations other than the CIA are capable of distributing food and vaccines

2. Maybe harris should have thought it was worth not supporting a genocide to prevent that then.

You guys still haven't caught on that you're missing the core of this. There were 2 groups that refused to budge which allowed trump to take power. One group refused to support a genocide, one group refused to stop supporting a genocide.

So how the fuck are libs more mad about the anti-genocide group for refusing to budge? Seems worth being stubborn about to me, you know, if you think genocide is bad.

I would have maybe a single ounce of sympathy for the lib side of this argument if the stakes were lower. 'You don't always get everything you want' is a hell of a lot more convincing if the left had refused to play ball over healthcare reform or something. But jesus christ 'don't do genocide' is the lowest possible bar to clear and Kamala still refused.