▲ 1925 ▼ Dumb glasses (lemmy.world) submitted 4 months ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 438 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 months ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lumen@feddit.nl -23 points 4 months ago (3 children) I don't appreciate the threat of violence. I won't surrender my property to you, you will not destroy my property, you will not hurt me without me defending myself, and your attorney will not bend the law for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] tjsauce@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 child) You really want these glasses, don't you? You're smart enough to debate the hypothetical, but miss the obvious point that new things will not be regulated as they should be, so the law doesn't function as it should in this situation. You cling tightly to the law as if it's doing what it's meant to do, when we both know you'd be taking advantage of the lack of laws for no clear benefit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lumen@feddit.nl -11 points 4 months ago (2 children) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tjsauce@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago What part didn't you understand? permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 months ago Actually insufferable. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago Let's say hypothetically that he assaults you, you sue him, then he raises 200k$ for his defense through crowdfunding because I bet the majority of people don't want creeps to record them secretly. You're still confident in your odds? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lumen@feddit.nl -23 points 4 months ago (3 children) I don't appreciate the threat of violence. I won't surrender my property to you, you will not destroy my property, you will not hurt me without me defending myself, and your attorney will not bend the law for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] tjsauce@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 child) You really want these glasses, don't you? You're smart enough to debate the hypothetical, but miss the obvious point that new things will not be regulated as they should be, so the law doesn't function as it should in this situation. You cling tightly to the law as if it's doing what it's meant to do, when we both know you'd be taking advantage of the lack of laws for no clear benefit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lumen@feddit.nl -11 points 4 months ago (2 children) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tjsauce@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago What part didn't you understand? permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 months ago Actually insufferable. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago Let's say hypothetically that he assaults you, you sue him, then he raises 200k$ for his defense through crowdfunding because I bet the majority of people don't want creeps to record them secretly. You're still confident in your odds? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tjsauce@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 child) You really want these glasses, don't you? You're smart enough to debate the hypothetical, but miss the obvious point that new things will not be regulated as they should be, so the law doesn't function as it should in this situation. You cling tightly to the law as if it's doing what it's meant to do, when we both know you'd be taking advantage of the lack of laws for no clear benefit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lumen@feddit.nl -11 points 4 months ago (2 children) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tjsauce@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago What part didn't you understand? permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 months ago Actually insufferable. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lumen@feddit.nl -11 points 4 months ago (2 children) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tjsauce@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago What part didn't you understand? permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 months ago Actually insufferable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tjsauce@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago What part didn't you understand? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago Let's say hypothetically that he assaults you, you sue him, then he raises 200k$ for his defense through crowdfunding because I bet the majority of people don't want creeps to record them secretly. You're still confident in your odds? permalink fedilink source parent