215
if you could standardise a file format for a specific task what would you pick and why (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
285 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why?

e.g. flac for lossless audio because...

(yes you can add new categories)

summary:

  1. photos .jxl
  2. open domain image data .exr
  3. videos .av1
  4. lossless audio .flac
  5. lossy audio .opus
  6. subtitles srt/ass
  7. fonts .otf
  8. container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl)
  9. plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation)
  10. documents .odt
  11. archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst
  12. configuration files toml
  13. typesetting typst
  14. interchange format .ora
  15. models .gltf / .glb
  16. daw session files .dawproject
  17. otdr measurement results .xml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 46 points 2 years ago (4 children)

JPEG-XL for rasterized images.

https://jpegxl.info/why-jxl.html

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago*

    I agree.

    I especially love that it addresses the biggest pitfall of the typical "fancy new format does things better than the one we're already using" transition, in that it's specifically engineered to make migration easier, by allowing a lossless conversion from the dominant format.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    How does it compare to AVIF?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •