▲ 215 ▼ if you could standardise a file format for a specific task what would you pick and why (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by jackpot@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml 285 comments fedilink hide all child comments if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why? e.g. flac for lossless audio because... (yes you can add new categories) summary: photos .jxl open domain image data .exr videos .av1 lossless audio .flac lossy audio .opus subtitles srt/ass fonts .otf container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl) plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation) documents .odt archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst configuration files toml typesetting typst interchange format .ora models .gltf / .glb daw session files .dawproject otdr measurement results .xml
[–] d_k_bo@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) AVIF is slower, has a way smaller maximum resolution and doesn't support progressive decoding as well as lossless JPEG recompression. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Oh dam, that resolution limit is a total deal breaker. Can't believe anyone would release a format with those limitations today... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Oh dam, that resolution limit is a total deal breaker. Can't believe anyone would release a format with those limitations today... permalink fedilink source parent