And yes, I know people will say block keywords and communities, but people don't understand some communities have rules and people must follow them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [M] 84 points 5 months ago (10 children)

This got reported as being not twitter or equal. I'm kind of on the fence about this. I see their point, but the original was twitter. Please tell me what you think in the comments, not just downvote or upvote. This will guide me in the future if we have any more posts like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    It probably shouldn't be allowed in the future, but given that it has > 300 up-votes and is only now spurring a finer definition of the rule, I think it warrants an exception. If OP reads this, they now know to post this kinda thing in a different community in the future. But removing this particular post seems a little harsh.

    Edit: This is an awesome approach to moderation btw. People like you make lemmy great, thank you!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I was searching for a community to post it, but I couldn't find any. This one seemed closer to the idea l, a post where it says something. I also think I saw a photo from Facebook in this community, so...m Maybe we need a community about posts like these, but not twitter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Do whatever, ruleslawyering is not helpful. Is the community enjoying it? It stays. Is it detrimental? It gets removed. The "rules" should be more like guidelines to suggest to posters what type of content the intent of the community is, not what type of content is permissible.

    Is someone posting vaguely in the direction of the intent of the community? That would be good enough for me.

    Anyone trying to separate posts into increasingly niche communities (like the asinine dontdeadopeninside and nosafetysmokingfirst split on reddit) is not helping the community of posters and lurkers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    The “rules” should be more like guidelines to suggest to posters what type of content the intent of the community is, not what type of content is permissible.

    I totally agree. Rules number 1, 4, and 5 are the most important, in my opinion. I'm not saying that there shouldn't be rules in the communities; there definitely should be rules. Guidelines for what to post instead of what not to post will probably be more beneficial.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    I don’t tend to think of wpt as specifically twitter posts. Maybe that’s how it started, but over time it has become a more generalized “screenshots of short text posts” type of thing in my mind. The “or similar” in the rules leaves a lot of ambiguity, but in my mind Twitter was always about short text posts, so any short text posts would fall under that “similar” umbrella. I wouldn’t object to seeing something from Facebook, Instagram, or Reddit being posted here as long as it was a text post and not super long, so it feels disingenuous to complain about a Lemmy post being here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Especially since, twitter isn't even twitter anymore. And the only thing you are going to get from what twitter has become is ragebait, bots, and racism. For "whitepeopletwitter" to continue and not end up dying from lack of content, it needs to start opening up to other sources that stick with the same idea as what twitter used to supply.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    the original was twitter

    As in, the post was originally on Twitter? I'm not sure what this means

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Fighting to remove as many posts as possible on Lemmy when we barely get any posts at all doesn't make sense; ignore the people requesting you take a popular post down for some potential technicality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments