▲ 140 ▼ The EU Moves To Kill Infinite Scrolling (tech.slashdot.org) submitted 6 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip [M] to c/technology@lemmy.zip 32 comments fedilink hide all child comments Doom scrolling is doomed, if the EU gets its way.
[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 7 points 6 months ago (1 child) You're comparing a dark pattern to a basic interface element. It's not like they're talking about scrolling itself, And infinite scrolling absolutely is a problem on its own, regardless of content. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) The ability to scroll down forever is not something a government should control. We need accountability not bullshit laws. By blaming a user interface, the rich have tricked you into allowing them to keep doing what they are doing. If this passes, you’ll be placated. Something is “being done” but that’s just a lie they told you to believe. The CONTENT is the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) I can see where you're coming from, in light of EU policy proposals like Chat Control. But that doesn't mean everything that comes out of them is problematic. We need accountability not bullshit laws. Well this is accountability. By making this a law, companies can actually be fined about it. Infinite scrolling is a dark pattern. It's not used to help you, it's used to get you addicted. The CONTENT is the problem. Both are. The content and the manipulative addictive design decisions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) Ok well let’s ban all scrolling. Scrollbars too. Everything has to be pages with buttons. Including file browsers. Can’t have those getting out of hand. Don’t even get me started on file previews permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I also get what you mean. Petty laws are just the system's way of more make-belief instead of fundamental true change. Also, infinite scroll is a horrible addiction pattern and it's still a separate thing than regular scrolling of a finite amount of data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) So should stock photography websites also be banned from allowing a scroll that is technically finite at 10 billion images or… are we offering exclusions that can be easily abused? Technically, there is a finite number of twitter and Snapchat posts if they never repeat previously viewed items. Good luck making that an enforceable law!! And, enjoy the false hope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago Oh I'm not enforcing it. I just get that it's one of those poison things in social media permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) The ability to scroll down forever is not something a government should control. We need accountability not bullshit laws. By blaming a user interface, the rich have tricked you into allowing them to keep doing what they are doing. If this passes, you’ll be placated. Something is “being done” but that’s just a lie they told you to believe. The CONTENT is the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) I can see where you're coming from, in light of EU policy proposals like Chat Control. But that doesn't mean everything that comes out of them is problematic. We need accountability not bullshit laws. Well this is accountability. By making this a law, companies can actually be fined about it. Infinite scrolling is a dark pattern. It's not used to help you, it's used to get you addicted. The CONTENT is the problem. Both are. The content and the manipulative addictive design decisions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) Ok well let’s ban all scrolling. Scrollbars too. Everything has to be pages with buttons. Including file browsers. Can’t have those getting out of hand. Don’t even get me started on file previews permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I also get what you mean. Petty laws are just the system's way of more make-belief instead of fundamental true change. Also, infinite scroll is a horrible addiction pattern and it's still a separate thing than regular scrolling of a finite amount of data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) So should stock photography websites also be banned from allowing a scroll that is technically finite at 10 billion images or… are we offering exclusions that can be easily abused? Technically, there is a finite number of twitter and Snapchat posts if they never repeat previously viewed items. Good luck making that an enforceable law!! And, enjoy the false hope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago Oh I'm not enforcing it. I just get that it's one of those poison things in social media permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) I can see where you're coming from, in light of EU policy proposals like Chat Control. But that doesn't mean everything that comes out of them is problematic. We need accountability not bullshit laws. Well this is accountability. By making this a law, companies can actually be fined about it. Infinite scrolling is a dark pattern. It's not used to help you, it's used to get you addicted. The CONTENT is the problem. Both are. The content and the manipulative addictive design decisions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) Ok well let’s ban all scrolling. Scrollbars too. Everything has to be pages with buttons. Including file browsers. Can’t have those getting out of hand. Don’t even get me started on file previews permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I also get what you mean. Petty laws are just the system's way of more make-belief instead of fundamental true change. Also, infinite scroll is a horrible addiction pattern and it's still a separate thing than regular scrolling of a finite amount of data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) So should stock photography websites also be banned from allowing a scroll that is technically finite at 10 billion images or… are we offering exclusions that can be easily abused? Technically, there is a finite number of twitter and Snapchat posts if they never repeat previously viewed items. Good luck making that an enforceable law!! And, enjoy the false hope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago Oh I'm not enforcing it. I just get that it's one of those poison things in social media permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) Ok well let’s ban all scrolling. Scrollbars too. Everything has to be pages with buttons. Including file browsers. Can’t have those getting out of hand. Don’t even get me started on file previews permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I also get what you mean. Petty laws are just the system's way of more make-belief instead of fundamental true change. Also, infinite scroll is a horrible addiction pattern and it's still a separate thing than regular scrolling of a finite amount of data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) So should stock photography websites also be banned from allowing a scroll that is technically finite at 10 billion images or… are we offering exclusions that can be easily abused? Technically, there is a finite number of twitter and Snapchat posts if they never repeat previously viewed items. Good luck making that an enforceable law!! And, enjoy the false hope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago Oh I'm not enforcing it. I just get that it's one of those poison things in social media permalink fedilink source parent
[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I also get what you mean. Petty laws are just the system's way of more make-belief instead of fundamental true change. Also, infinite scroll is a horrible addiction pattern and it's still a separate thing than regular scrolling of a finite amount of data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) So should stock photography websites also be banned from allowing a scroll that is technically finite at 10 billion images or… are we offering exclusions that can be easily abused? Technically, there is a finite number of twitter and Snapchat posts if they never repeat previously viewed items. Good luck making that an enforceable law!! And, enjoy the false hope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago Oh I'm not enforcing it. I just get that it's one of those poison things in social media permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dieICEdie@lemmy.org 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) So should stock photography websites also be banned from allowing a scroll that is technically finite at 10 billion images or… are we offering exclusions that can be easily abused? Technically, there is a finite number of twitter and Snapchat posts if they never repeat previously viewed items. Good luck making that an enforceable law!! And, enjoy the false hope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago Oh I'm not enforcing it. I just get that it's one of those poison things in social media permalink fedilink source parent
[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago Oh I'm not enforcing it. I just get that it's one of those poison things in social media permalink fedilink source parent