In a press conference this week on New York City’s $12 billion budget gap, Mayor Zohran Mamdani zeroed in on the previous administration’s artificial intelligence chatbot as one of “a number of different things we’re going to pursue for savings.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 74 points 6 months ago (35 children)
  • [–] 155 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    They don't like electoralism, prefer to LARP revolution while doing nothing to actually lay the groundwork for one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 116 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Which is sort of wild.

    Marx was very clear that communism could not be delivered by heroes on horseback. But then again, Tankies don't like Marx, they like Lenin, the man who lost an election to actual communists and then had them all killed. He seized power via coup, and then made himself a king, and wrote how kings (vanguard parties) were somehow vital to communism, and how democracy was not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    "If your last name ends in 'in', it's time to get out."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Tankies are chicken-hawks.

    They gladly let millions of marginalized peoples suffer and die for a pipedream that those people will fight a communist revolution... on the tankies' behalf.

    Tankies won't ever be the ones on the front line. They spam fuck comment sections and try to convince as many people as possible to act against their own self interests, to put them in a desperate enough state that the tankoes can more easily manipulate them.

    Tankies aren't communists, they're red fascists. Same abuser mentality as the fascists they so gleefully surrendered to in November 2024.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 55 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    One thing I've learned as a socialist is that there is always a purity test by people who consider themselves purer socialists.

    Karl Marx himself could post on here and people would accuse him of being a neoliberal stooge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Tankies don't like anyone, they'll never be satisfied. I'm fairly certain most of them are russian trolls tasked with sowing discord and fracturing the left.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Excuse me, we're Chinese trolls, thanks very much; we are unhealthily obsessed with China because it's incredibly economically successful, it's the last hope of actual oldschool dictatorship of the worker socialism, and it's barely avoided being controlled by the market.

    It's incredibly centralised, it's authoritarian, yes, but it's also building all the solar panels and executing billionaires when they get too powerful and making the imperial nations look like chumps, so you should forgive us for our infatuation.

    My lack of action and lack of building local organisation? Guilty. I'm trying to correct this. China is not the model for the West, and even the Chinese govt says that, so as a true Chinahead I do not call for Chad Xi to come save us, that is missing the fucking point. We must grow our own socialist organisations to bypass the state, and anarchists and syndicalists might be the best idea for the West, with our individualism and love of freedom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I honestly can't tell if you're being facetious or not...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That's probably because my thoughts on the matter are not incredibly settled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    That's fine. The real world is messy; it's never about "good versus bad," it's always about "better in this context versus worse in this context."

    China does some things better, like green energy. They're also pretty bad in some areas, like worker's rights, political representation, and human rights in general.

    That being said, if they saved us from trump, I for one would welcome our new yuan-based overlords.

    China is still a capitalist country though. It's state capitalism, but capitalism nonetheless. Calling themselves communist is really just branding.

    Based on some other comments though, clearly tankies in the west don't understand that there can be a discrepancy between what one calls oneself and what one truly is. Oh well...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Historically, a socialist holding an elected executive office of a capitalist government is a precarious position fraught with contradictions. You can only meaningfully govern by making massive concessions to the ruling class and betraying some supporters. Communists will stake out the "he will betray you" position.

    FWIW the Mamdani administration is very aware of this contradiction and deliberately made promises that he can do by decree, such as the rent freeze. But there's also been some rather heinous concessions, like keeping on a bunch of Zionists in the admin, and also keeping on the NYPD commissioner Jessica Tisch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Why would you argue that we should stop doing our duties once we have cast our ballot and the candidate we support won?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Idk why you think I was arguing that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    because advocating against the current DNC establishment is a necessary step to take to stopping the rachet and pinion mechanism. As long as people like chuck schumer exist in the party you can't be serious about change while advocating to "vote blue no matter who"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    I never even mentioned the DNC or "vote blue" bullshit. You seem to be eager to argue with someone who has opinions different than mine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child)

    well yes, I was arguing what HazardousBanjo said. I am on voyager. My initial comment to their parent comment is below yours and the comment from luthis, but not in reply to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I'd say they're skeptical that Mamdani will keep to his promises or that electing him isn't enough. But dislike? I bet every one would've voted for him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (29 replies)