Typically I score around -7,-8 on political compass. So, very much not "right wing".

Canny with those snap judgements and mono-linear conflations.

I'm mad at the badness in SFA for not upholding the ideals of Gene Roddenberry, and for being crass militaristic propaganda normalising hate, rather than countering it.

I'm not complaining about it being "woke". Pray tell, where, oh where, was that notion picked up from? Seems as absurdly wrong as Star Trek Starfleet Academy is. Arguably, I'm complaining it's not "woke" enough, depending on which newspeak dictionary version of "woke" you're using. I'm complaining that it's corporate (right wing) dumb-down, stripped of the defining moral fiber, the ethical exploration, the freedom, the self improvement for each and all... y'know, the goodness that makes Star Trek Star Trek?

Quick to ignore = wilfully ignorant?

The Socratic method, and mature epistemological dialogue (like Star Trek's famous for), may serve us all very well. Would be good to have a new Star Trek that lives up to this, having humility, curiosity, and a rigorous search for the ideal when confronted with moral dilemmas, rather than just fire the phasers; swing the hammer; click the ignore button, like we've left ourselves weakened with only one tool in our toolbox, seeing every problem like the same threat. Y'know?