▲ 250 ▼ Some posted back of Pizza box puzzle. Here my cereal box. (lemmy.world) submitted 6 months ago by Fredselfish@lemmy.world to c/pics@lemmy.world 51 comments fedilink hide all child comments If your bored during the snow storm and need something to do. And just FYI I miss when they had toys in the box instead of these things.
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world [S] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) Awesome same route I took. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 months ago You also skipped hexes 6 and 13 permalink fedilink source parent [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 child) Near as I can tell it's the only route that works. Also, it's super easy if you start at 50 and work down. All the "tricky" forked pathes are set to lead you wrong if you're starting from one. Since there's only one winning route, by starting at 50, you never have issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago* (2 children) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) You mean a correct route? I feel like I'm in bizzaro world. Go straight down from start and you're good to not skip 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 3 points 6 months ago There's 2 correct routes that don't skip any numbers. The one you mentioned, and the one shown in the pic (the one shown skips a couple numbers, yes, but it can actually pick up those numbers without any trouble.) permalink fedilink source parent [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 6 months ago (1 child) I didn't check the route pictured. I just solved it and then came to the comments. What I said stands. Start at 50 and work backwards. You pretty much can't screw it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) You said the only route. I'm pointing out that there's 2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Technically there's three other combinations besides OP's, if you wanna be a dick about it. But they're all that same path with just minor changes before hoping back on that same path again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 months ago You also skipped hexes 6 and 13 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 child) Near as I can tell it's the only route that works. Also, it's super easy if you start at 50 and work down. All the "tricky" forked pathes are set to lead you wrong if you're starting from one. Since there's only one winning route, by starting at 50, you never have issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago* (2 children) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) You mean a correct route? I feel like I'm in bizzaro world. Go straight down from start and you're good to not skip 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 3 points 6 months ago There's 2 correct routes that don't skip any numbers. The one you mentioned, and the one shown in the pic (the one shown skips a couple numbers, yes, but it can actually pick up those numbers without any trouble.) permalink fedilink source parent [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 6 months ago (1 child) I didn't check the route pictured. I just solved it and then came to the comments. What I said stands. Start at 50 and work backwards. You pretty much can't screw it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) You said the only route. I'm pointing out that there's 2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Technically there's three other combinations besides OP's, if you wanna be a dick about it. But they're all that same path with just minor changes before hoping back on that same path again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago* (2 children) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) You mean a correct route? I feel like I'm in bizzaro world. Go straight down from start and you're good to not skip 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 3 points 6 months ago There's 2 correct routes that don't skip any numbers. The one you mentioned, and the one shown in the pic (the one shown skips a couple numbers, yes, but it can actually pick up those numbers without any trouble.) permalink fedilink source parent [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 6 months ago (1 child) I didn't check the route pictured. I just solved it and then came to the comments. What I said stands. Start at 50 and work backwards. You pretty much can't screw it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) You said the only route. I'm pointing out that there's 2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Technically there's three other combinations besides OP's, if you wanna be a dick about it. But they're all that same path with just minor changes before hoping back on that same path again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) You mean a correct route? I feel like I'm in bizzaro world. Go straight down from start and you're good to not skip 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 3 points 6 months ago There's 2 correct routes that don't skip any numbers. The one you mentioned, and the one shown in the pic (the one shown skips a couple numbers, yes, but it can actually pick up those numbers without any trouble.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 3 points 6 months ago There's 2 correct routes that don't skip any numbers. The one you mentioned, and the one shown in the pic (the one shown skips a couple numbers, yes, but it can actually pick up those numbers without any trouble.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 6 months ago (1 child) I didn't check the route pictured. I just solved it and then came to the comments. What I said stands. Start at 50 and work backwards. You pretty much can't screw it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) You said the only route. I'm pointing out that there's 2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Technically there's three other combinations besides OP's, if you wanna be a dick about it. But they're all that same path with just minor changes before hoping back on that same path again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) You said the only route. I'm pointing out that there's 2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Technically there's three other combinations besides OP's, if you wanna be a dick about it. But they're all that same path with just minor changes before hoping back on that same path again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Technically there's three other combinations besides OP's, if you wanna be a dick about it. But they're all that same path with just minor changes before hoping back on that same path again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
