▲ 250 ▼ Some posted back of Pizza box puzzle. Here my cereal box. (lemmy.world) submitted 6 months ago by Fredselfish@lemmy.world to c/pics@lemmy.world 51 comments fedilink hide all child comments If your bored during the snow storm and need something to do. And just FYI I miss when they had toys in the box instead of these things.
[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago* (2 children) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) You mean a correct route? I feel like I'm in bizzaro world. Go straight down from start and you're good to not skip 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 3 points 6 months ago There's 2 correct routes that don't skip any numbers. The one you mentioned, and the one shown in the pic (the one shown skips a couple numbers, yes, but it can actually pick up those numbers without any trouble.) permalink fedilink source parent [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 6 months ago (1 child) I didn't check the route pictured. I just solved it and then came to the comments. What I said stands. Start at 50 and work backwards. You pretty much can't screw it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) You said the only route. I'm pointing out that there's 2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Technically there's three other combinations besides OP's, if you wanna be a dick about it. But they're all that same path with just minor changes before hoping back on that same path again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) You mean a correct route? I feel like I'm in bizzaro world. Go straight down from start and you're good to not skip 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 3 points 6 months ago There's 2 correct routes that don't skip any numbers. The one you mentioned, and the one shown in the pic (the one shown skips a couple numbers, yes, but it can actually pick up those numbers without any trouble.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 3 points 6 months ago There's 2 correct routes that don't skip any numbers. The one you mentioned, and the one shown in the pic (the one shown skips a couple numbers, yes, but it can actually pick up those numbers without any trouble.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 6 months ago (1 child) I didn't check the route pictured. I just solved it and then came to the comments. What I said stands. Start at 50 and work backwards. You pretty much can't screw it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) You said the only route. I'm pointing out that there's 2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Technically there's three other combinations besides OP's, if you wanna be a dick about it. But they're all that same path with just minor changes before hoping back on that same path again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) You said the only route. I'm pointing out that there's 2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Technically there's three other combinations besides OP's, if you wanna be a dick about it. But they're all that same path with just minor changes before hoping back on that same path again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Technically there's three other combinations besides OP's, if you wanna be a dick about it. But they're all that same path with just minor changes before hoping back on that same path again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) There's another correct route that doesn't skip any numbers Could you point out the part where I was being a dick? Jeez. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. He just drew his lines wrong in a couple spots. He had it right. It's not like he skipped numbers because he was on a dead route. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) For starters, op had the right way. Yes? I didn't claim or imply otherwise. I was literally only replying to your statement of 'it’s the only route that works.' by just noting that there was a second route that also works. I have literally no idea why you're taking offense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 6 months ago Your second route is pretty much just the same route. You just go off it a little and then back onto it again. permalink fedilink source parent
