you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Lol, I didn't have to read the URL to know what that link was going to be. Wikipedia continues to be The Holy Scripture to western shitlibs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    You should really counter point with your own source if you're going to tell someone their source is insufficient

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    No. That's not remotely how that works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    I would argue that Wikipedia while not a great primary source has pretty stringent guidelines for providing sources in its articles. So you've answered with a thought terminating cliche and refused to elaborate. In other words you're incorrect and too fragile to admit it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    That's not what a thought terminating cliche is. And no, the fact I didn't bother to get bogged down in whatever tedious secondary argument you want to have does not remotely mean my initial point is wrong.

  • source
  • parent