▲ 396 ▼ Victims of Communism (lemmy.ml) submitted 7 months ago by hamid@crazypeople.online to c/memes@lemmy.ml 210 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) No. That's not remotely how that works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children) I would argue that Wikipedia while not a great primary source has pretty stringent guidelines for providing sources in its articles. So you've answered with a thought terminating cliche and refused to elaborate. In other words you're incorrect and too fragile to admit it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago* Imagine if every idiot could just say "You didn't debate me that means reality is what I claim!" and have it be true permalink fedilink source parent [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago That's not what a thought terminating cliche is. And no, the fact I didn't bother to get bogged down in whatever tedious secondary argument you want to have does not remotely mean my initial point is wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children) I would argue that Wikipedia while not a great primary source has pretty stringent guidelines for providing sources in its articles. So you've answered with a thought terminating cliche and refused to elaborate. In other words you're incorrect and too fragile to admit it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago* Imagine if every idiot could just say "You didn't debate me that means reality is what I claim!" and have it be true permalink fedilink source parent [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago That's not what a thought terminating cliche is. And no, the fact I didn't bother to get bogged down in whatever tedious secondary argument you want to have does not remotely mean my initial point is wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago* Imagine if every idiot could just say "You didn't debate me that means reality is what I claim!" and have it be true permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago That's not what a thought terminating cliche is. And no, the fact I didn't bother to get bogged down in whatever tedious secondary argument you want to have does not remotely mean my initial point is wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
