1104
Both sides are the same (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
196 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

I'd love to see a utopia, but I don't see communism making any sustainable inroads anywhere in the world... that is, unless things get much much worse, to the point that your average man is willing to pick up a pitchfork (or other weapon of choice) and participate in overthrowing ruling class by force.... but nowadays the masses are so divided and confused that they'll probably start killing each other for scraps of food rather than the billionaires for a life of dignity. Even then, it's just temporary until capitalism and/or authoritarianism takes hold again.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Who talked about utopia? The USSR was far from a utopia, it was a state with flaws and lots of mistakes were made in the process. It is still demonstrably significantly more fair, egalitarian and less exploitative than anything we have in the west, which relies in the exploitation of the global south to sustain itself.

    The whole "Utopian socialism" thing is a 200 years old argument that was dismantled back then, by the way. Engels himself has an essay called "Socialism: Utopian and Scientific", explaining how early branches of socialism followed utopian goals and methods, but Marxism is scientific socialism based off historical materialism and empiricism. If you look at my comments above, I've talked about historical evidence with hard data, not about good wishes for the future.

    I don't see communism making any sustainable inroads anywhere in the world

    That is if you ignore the main industrial powerhouse of the world (China), the island of Cuba, or the nations of Vietnam and Laos.

    unless things get much much worse

    As if, for example, the west started to support a genocide that murders over half a million people (most of them children), or if militarized police started kidnapping and disappearing random citizens without due process in the USA, or if fascist governments linked to Nazism and Fascism started to win elections in Italy or Germany?

    Even then, it's just temporary until capitalism takes hold again

    To quote Ursula K. Le Guin: "We live in capitalism. Its power seems inescapable. So did the divine right of kings"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    The USSR is dead and cold, replaced by an authoritarian warmongering machine. It had its moment in the spotlight, but it failed, and it failed its russian and former citizens.

    China promotes many good principles (in many ways so did the USA, cough cough), but it is heading in the wrong direction under Xi. It's Communism with a human exploitative flavour, with the occasional public fig leaf of justice. That said, it could offer an umbrella of security for some more interesting experiments in the years to come. Watch this space, I guess.

    Circling back to my original point, I maintain that communism isn't going to gain popular support so long as the only viable way to achieve it is through violence and oppression, and so long as it buckles so easily under the pressure of outside forces.

    I will continue voting and protesting for sensible left-leaning policies that promote fairness and well being for all, while steering clear of the extremists and simpletons who promote hate or explicitly or tacitly support genocides, wars of aggression, etc. The scales may tip enough one day to justify radical action, but not today - the risks of it going terribly wrong are too high.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent