▲ 215 ▼ Counter Strike 2 is surprisingly awful on Steam Deck right now (www.pcgamesn.com) submitted 2 years ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/games@sh.itjust.works 127 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Why is it called CS2, though, instead of CS4? I mean, it's the fourth game in the series, isn't it? CS CS:Source CS:GO CS2??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] silentknyght@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago Because calling it CS4 would mean admitting they made a "3". permalink fedilink source parent [–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) because source wasn't a sequel to them, just an engine port. Why counterstrike 2 is called 2, imo, just because Source 2 Being a new game in a series doesn't necessarily mean that its the next numbered game, especially to valve. Technically speaking, the other counterstrike project (Condition Zero, single player content) is also a thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Indicah@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Why so aggressive? permalink fedilink source parent [–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago Hence "to them", not to people. They did make changes. But that doesnt stop what they think. Your opinion doesnt change what they think. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Psythik@lemm.ee -7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) They should have called it CS: Source 2, then. The game hasn't changed enough to be considered a sequel. They made the same amount of improvements to this one as they always have in the last. Doesn't make sense to call it a full-blown sequel. They probably figured that if Blizzard could get away with calling it Overwatch 2, despite being the same game, they probably could too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skwerls@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago Wait until you hear about call of duty permalink fedilink source parent
[–] silentknyght@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago Because calling it CS4 would mean admitting they made a "3". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) because source wasn't a sequel to them, just an engine port. Why counterstrike 2 is called 2, imo, just because Source 2 Being a new game in a series doesn't necessarily mean that its the next numbered game, especially to valve. Technically speaking, the other counterstrike project (Condition Zero, single player content) is also a thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Indicah@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Why so aggressive? permalink fedilink source parent [–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago Hence "to them", not to people. They did make changes. But that doesnt stop what they think. Your opinion doesnt change what they think. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Psythik@lemm.ee -7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) They should have called it CS: Source 2, then. The game hasn't changed enough to be considered a sequel. They made the same amount of improvements to this one as they always have in the last. Doesn't make sense to call it a full-blown sequel. They probably figured that if Blizzard could get away with calling it Overwatch 2, despite being the same game, they probably could too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skwerls@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago Wait until you hear about call of duty permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Indicah@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Why so aggressive? permalink fedilink source parent [–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago Hence "to them", not to people. They did make changes. But that doesnt stop what they think. Your opinion doesnt change what they think. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago Hence "to them", not to people. They did make changes. But that doesnt stop what they think. Your opinion doesnt change what they think. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Psythik@lemm.ee -7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) They should have called it CS: Source 2, then. The game hasn't changed enough to be considered a sequel. They made the same amount of improvements to this one as they always have in the last. Doesn't make sense to call it a full-blown sequel. They probably figured that if Blizzard could get away with calling it Overwatch 2, despite being the same game, they probably could too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skwerls@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago Wait until you hear about call of duty permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skwerls@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago Wait until you hear about call of duty permalink fedilink source parent